CFTC commissioner says agency has broad enforcement authority on crypto derivatives

Published at: Aug. 23, 2021

Dawn Stump, one of four commissioners currently serving at the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, or CFTC, has released a statement clarifying the agency's authority with respect to digital assets. 

In a Monday statement, Stump said the CFTC is empowered with both regulatory and enforcement authority for commodities. She did not specifically say that digital assets were cash-like commodities in the eyes of the regulatory body, but “even if a digital asset is a commodity, it is not regulated by the CFTC.” According to the commissioner, however, the agency is within its power to regulate derivatives on digital assets, “such as the futures contracts on Bitcoin and Ether listed for trading on various CFTC-regulated exchanges.”

U.S. government agencies including the CFTC, Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) are largely responsible for handling digital asset regulation and enforcement in the country. However, each has different jurisdictional claims regarding crypto, often leading to confusion for companies trying to operate within the law.

According to the commissioner, the CFTC should analyze a digital asset that is already considered to be a security — and would thus fall under the SEC’s regulatory umbrella — to determine where the agency’s regulatory authority would lie for a derivatives product for that same project. However, she clarified that the CFTC had enforcement authority over financial products that it currently regulates.

“A trading platform that offers derivatives on digital assets to U.S. persons without registering, or in violation of CFTC trading rules, is subject to the CFTC’s enforcement authority,” said Stump. “That was the case in the recent CFTC enforcement action against BitMEX, and the CFTC has brought similar such actions dating back to 2015.”

She added:

"To determine the CFTC’s regulatory authority with respect to a digital asset, ask not whether the digital asset is a commodity or a security — ask whether a futures contract or other derivatives product is involved."

In the case of BitMEX, the crypto derivatives exchange agreed to pay $100 million as part of a settlement with both the CFTC and the FinCEN. However, the regulatory agency is also reportedly looking into Binance Holdings Limited for possible derivatives trades made by United States-based customers, and previously filed charges against the Laino Group for soliciting investors on Bitcoin (BTC), Ether (ETH), and Litecoin (LTC) futures trading without proper registration.

Related: Crypto-friendly CFTC Commissioner Brian Quintenz reportedly plans to step down

While Stump has taken a position that seems to relegate many cryptocurrencies to the SEC’s regulation and enforcement, she is only one of four voices — usually six — on the panel regulating commodities. Commissioner Brian Quintenz, a seemingly pro-crypto advocate in the CFTC, reportedly plans to step down at the end of August.

Tags
Law
Related Posts
U.S. Congressman calls for ‘Broad, bipartisan consensus’ on important issues of digital asset policy
In a letter to the leadership of the United States House Financial Services Committee, ranking member Patrick McHenry took a jab at “inconsistent treatment and jurisdictional uncertainty” inherent in U.S. crypto regulation and called for the Committee to take on its critical issues. McHenry, a Republican representing North Carolina, opened by mentioning that the Committee’s Democrat Chairwoman Maxine Waters is looking to schedule additional hearings addressing matters pertinent to the digital asset industry. He further stressed the need for identifying and prioritizing the key issues and achieving a “broad, bipartisan consensus” on the matters affecting the industry that holds immense …
Regulation / Jan. 25, 2022
Law Decoded: States’ crypto rights and the influx of digital money into analog politics, Feb. 7–14.
Several storylines that had been long in the making dominated last week’s news cycle in the cryptocurrency policy and enforcement department. The Russian government has made another huge step on the path toward creating a tailored regulatory framework for digital assets, unveiling its consolidated view that crypto is to be treated as currency rather than swept under the rug of a blanket ban. While this movement in the direction of crypto’s formal legitimization is a welcomed development, a host of questions persists related to both the exact shape of the new regime and its enforcement. The biggest enforcement story of …
Regulation / Feb. 14, 2022
The crypto industry can trust Cynthia Lummis to get regulation right
As the world waits to see America’s take on cryptocurrency regulation, crypto enthusiasts should keep one thing in mind: The industry can trust Senator Cynthia Lummis. Her proposal with Senator Kirsten Gillibrand, which we’ve all been waiting for action on, is bipartisan in nature. We’re still awaiting the final details, but things have slowed to a crawl with the November elections around the corner. United States Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman Gary Gensler has moved forward with commentary that suggests the Commodity Futures Trading Commission will take a major role in the oversight of Bitcoin (BTC), which, in and of …
Regulation / Sept. 19, 2022
GameFi investors should get ready for a big US crackdown
Are cryptocurrency games innocent fun? Or are they Ponzi schemes facing an imminent crackdown by regulators in the United States? Tokens related to cryptocurrency games — known colloquially as “GameFi” — were worth a cumulative total of nearly $10 billion as of mid-August, give or take a few billion. (The number may vary depending on whether you want to include partially finished projects, how you count the number of tokens that projects technically have in circulation, and so on.) In that sense, whether the games are legal is a $10 billion question that few investors have considered. And that’s an …
Regulation / Aug. 24, 2022
US lawmakers want State Department to justify crypto rewards and disclose payouts
The United States lawmakers have proposed an amendment to the State Department Basic Authorities Act of 1956 that includes information on crypto rewards and payouts. The proposed amendment under the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) requires the Department of State, an executive department of the U.S. federal government responsible for the country's foreign policy and relations, to inform about any crypto payouts or rewards within 15 days of making it. The NDAA is the name for each of a series of United States federal laws specifying the annual budget and expenditures of the U.S. Department of Defense. The official document …
Bitcoin / Dec. 7, 2022