Did Satoshi Just Move Craig Wright’s Bitcoins?

Published at: May 20, 2020

On May 20, reports indicated that Satoshi Nakamoto may have reactivated himself in order to move 50 Bitcoins (BTC) first mined back in February 2009. Upon further research, it was discovered that these were not just any Bitcoin. They are Bitcoin that Dr. Craig Wright himself has laid claim to.

Transactions in question

The transaction in question transferred 50 BTC to two addresses with a 40/10 split (this split is reminiscent of the famous first ever Bitcoin transfer, which sent 10 BTC from Satoshi to computer scientist, Hal Finney). The coins in today’s transaction were originally mined on February 9 2009, and have lain dormant for eleven years.

Transaction in Questions. Source:  Blockstream Explorer.

While 40 BTC remain unspent, it appears that the 10 BTC ended up in a mixer, says Chainalysis:

“We are still looking into it but it appears that 40 BTC went to a legacy address and remains unspent and 10 BTC appears to have gone into a mixer. I'll keep you posted if we find out much more beyond that.”

Bitcoin Transactions in Question. Source: OXT Explorer.

Chainalysis later updated their findings:

“It does look like some of the money ended up at Coinbase”.

Wright v. Satoshi

This story gets more interesting. The address where the freshly mined 50 BTC had been hibernating until today, 17XiVVooLcdCUCMf9s4t4jTExacxwFS5uh, was listed in a court document in the Kleinman v. Wright case, in which Craig Wright listed it as his own.

A Court Document That Lists 17XiVVooLcdCUCMf9s4t4jTExacxwFS5uh as Belonging to Dr. Wright.

We reached out to Dr. Wright’s attorney, Andres Rivero, to ask whether his client was the one who moved the coins. He responded saying:

“No comment. Will be in touch if we are going to say anything.”

It is not clear from the response whether the attorney had nothing to say because his client was not involved in the transaction, or because it is not time yet for him to speak.

If it turns out that Dr. Wright, indeed, did not move these Bitcoins, then one could conclude that they never belonged to him. And if these do not belong to him, then it is possible that the other addresses on the list do not belong to Dr. Wright either. That would be highly unlikely however, given Dr. Wright’s track record of honesty before the court.

Fortunately, the Kleiman v. Wright Case, which could potentially put an end to the speculation, is scheduled to go to trial on July 6.

We sent a followup email to Dr. Wright’s attorney and to Dr. Wright, but have not received a response in time for publication.

It ain’t him, say experts

Meanwhile we reached out to some of the best Bitcoin forensics experts in the business to get their thoughts on the issue. 

Sergio Demian Lerner, designer of RSK and Bitcoin researcher, has published research through the years that purportedly identifies approximately 1.1 million Bitcoins mined by Satoshi. Cointelegraph reached out to Lerner to get his opinion on whether those coins might have been mined by Hal Finney instead, his response was unequivocal:

“I have no idea. Surely they are not Satoshi's”.

Chainalysis, the firm that made a name for itself by deanonomyzing Bitcoin, does not think these coins were mined by Satoshi either:

“Based on a quick look we don't think it's Satoshi”.

Market reacting

Meanwhile, Bitcoin’s market cap shed approximately $6.5 billion in the hour the news hit the internet. Perhaps, the market was concerned that Dr. Craig Wright, who asserts himself to be Satoshi Nakamoto, began delivering on his promise of dumping his stake

Bitcoin price drop. Source:  TradingView (Coinbase).

Although the Bitcoins behind this controversy go back to very early days, “old” Bitcoins are not unique — there are 1.4 million Bitcoins that have not been active in more than 10 years.

Number of Bitcoins That Has Not Been Moved in Over 10 years. Source: Glassnode.

Speculating on the topic of Satoshi is an endeavor that the crypto community seems to never tire of. Perhaps this will eventually lead to the real Satoshi revealing himself to cut this Gordian knot once and for all.

Tags
Related Posts
Was the first reply to the Bitcoin White Paper Satoshi himself? In-depth theory
Ever since Satoshi Natamoto, the anonymous inventor of Bitcoin, disappeared in 2011 there has been no shortage of theories about his identity. Hal Finney, Dorian Satoshi Nakamoto, Nick Szabo and Craig Wright have all be cited as possible contenders (even if CSW is the main person pushing that last theory.) Now, after months of research Quantum Economics’ Director of Gamefi Research Gerald Votta thinks that he has found the answer to Satoshi’s true identity — Canadian cryptographer James A. Donald. In a new research article piece on Nov. 17 Votta outlined intriguing circumstantial evidence he believes proves the link. Donald …
Bitcoin / Nov. 18, 2021
7 people who could be Bitcoin creator Satoshi Nakamoto
Satoshi Nakamoto is the pseudonym used by the creator(s) of Bitcoin, whose true identity remains unknown. The name was used to author the original Bitcoin (BTC) white paper in 2008 and to create and deploy the first Bitcoin software in 2009. Nakamoto’s true identity has never been revealed, and they have remained an enigma in the world of cryptocurrency. They are estimated to have mined around 1 million BTC in the early days of the network, which would make them one of the wealthiest people in the world. Some believe that Satoshi Nakamoto is a pseudonym for an individual, while …
Adoption / Jan. 24, 2023
Craig Wright Abandons Libel Suit Against Adam Back, Pays All Legal Fees
Crag Wright, the self-proclaimed Satoshi Nakamoto and chief scientist at NChain, has dropped a libel lawsuit against Adam Back over the Blockstream chief executive’s assertion that Wright was fraudulent in claiming to be the creator of Bitcoin (BTC). Wright filed the complaint alongside similar suits targeting Ethereum cofounder Vitalik Buterin, Bitcoin.com founder Roger Ver, podcaster Peter McCormack, and Twitter user ‘Hodlnaut’ one year ago. Craig Wright drops libel suit against Blockstream CEO On April 12, Adam Back tweeted that Craig Wright had abandoned his libel suit. Back stated that Wright’s representation “declined to give any explanation of why Craig retracted.” …
Bitcoin / April 13, 2020
Court Calls on Craig Wright’s Wife to Testify in Ongoing Kleiman Case
Judge Bruce Reinhart, who is overseeing the ongoing Kleiman v. Wright case, has requested international assistance in order to call Ramona Watts, Craig Wright’s wife, to the stand. Judge Reinhart sent his request to the Senior Master of the Queen’s Bench Division of the High Court in Strand, London, according to a court filing dated July 22. As per the filing, Judge Reinhart sent the request because he believes that the witnesses being called — three in total — have directly relevant evidence pursuant to the case. Regarding Watts, Reinhart wrote that she is being called in order to produce …
Bitcoin / July 25, 2019
Craig Wright Uses Falsified Docs to Prove Innocence in Kleiman Case: Report
Self-proclaimed Bitcoin (BTC) creator Craig Wright has allegedly provided fabricated court documents to prove a trust deed with his plaintiffs, as seen from documents revealed by trial lawyer Stephen Palley on Twitter on July 3. According to Palley, the self-styled Satoshi Nakamoto has failed to prove his case by presenting court documents that Palley alleges to be fake, as they contain multiple chronological discrepancies. Among the exhibits filed with the District Court for the Florida Southern District on July 3, there is a document submitted as proof of cooperation between Wright and the now-deceased David Kleiman, whose lawyers filed the …
Bitcoin / July 4, 2019