Satoshi Nakamoto Had Outside Cryptography Help, Says Early Bitcoin Dev

Published at: June 1, 2020

According to an early Bitcoin (BTC) developer, Satoshi Nakamoto sought help from outside cryptographers prior to launching Bitcoin.

Laszlo Hanyecz, who worked closely with Satsohi in 2010, told Cointelegraph that he was befuddled by Satoshi’s choice of the elliptic curve secp256k1. The use of this curve, at the time, was unusual. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) curves were much more common. Many Bitcoin enthusiasts over the years have been speculating as to whether this is luck or genius, as the curve chosen by Satoshi is more efficient and also makes any backdoor less likely.

“I had a bunch of people look at it”

At some point, Hanyecz sent Satoshi an email asking him why he picked this particular curve, Satoshi explained to Hanyecz that he had had some experts helping him:

“‘I had a bunch of people look at it and they told me this was good.’ And he didn't really elaborate on it, but he said he had experts look at it.”

It is not clear exactly when Satoshi sought this outside help, but prior to launching Bitcoin. Neither it is clear whether Satoshi just posted his questions on some cryptographic forums and mailing lists or had live communications with cryptographers. 

A few tries before Bitcoin

On another occasion, Hanyecz marvelling at the genius of the Bitcoin design, asked Satoshi: “How did you make this? Would you do this by yourself?”, without going into details, he reported that Satoshi told him:

“I took a few years [...] took a few tries. I've been working on it for a while.”

Generally, it is consistent with Satoshi’s public account of his work, in which he admits that he spent about eighteen months working on the code. We do not know if “few tries” refers to Satoshi's previous projects or to earlier versions of Bitcoin.

This account also adds interesting wrinkles to the debate of whether Adam Back was a part of the Satoshi team. Were Adam Back part of the team, would they still need to seek outside help? Back, probably like Satoshi, is not a professionally trained cryptographer and Hashcash does not employ an elliptic curve.

Another issue is that, taking into account how careful Satoshi had been making sure that he did not leave any identifiers, was the information that he shared with Hanyecz even truthful?

Nonetheless, any new fact that could potentially help us better understand the mystery behind Satoshi Nakamoto and the creation of Bitcoin is worth considering.

Tags
Related Posts
Charles Hoskinson: Blockstream Founder Adam Back 'Checks All The Boxes' as Satoshi
In a recent Cointelgraph interview, Ethereum co-founder and Cardano founder Charles Hoskinon said that he believes that Adam Back “checks all the boxes” as a Satoshi Nakamoto candidate. The puzzle of Satoshi’s true identity never seems to get old. Although Hoskinson admits that he does not have any hard evidence connecting the Blockstream’s founder to the pseudonymous Bitcoin creator, he did make a mental profile of Satoshi — Back seemingly has a perfect fit. Hoskinson believes that Satoshi was somebody, who lived either in Western Europe of the coastal United States, was comfortable with British English, and had a background …
Bitcoin / May 26, 2020
Adam Back Thinks Recent BTC Move Wasn't Satoshi
Cryptographer and inventor of Hashcash, Adam Back, does not think recent transactions from the 11-year-old wallet involve pseudonymous Bitcoin (BTC) creator Satoshi Nakamoto. "People need to chill," Back said in a May 20 tweet. "If Satoshi was selling coins, surely he would sell his most recently mined, and so most anonymous first." Bitcoin moved from a old wallet On the morning of May 20, the crypto market caught wind of Bitcoin transactions sent from one of the oldest known Bitcoin wallets. A wallet from 2009, just several weeks following Bitcoin's launch, received a mining reward of 50 BTC. Those Bitcoin …
Bitcoin / May 20, 2020
Adam Back: Bitcoin is Enough, Satoshi Should Stay Out
In a Cointelegraph interview, Adam Back provided additional clarity on his perceived Bitcoin (BTC) maximalism. Blockstream’s CEO believes that Bitcoin is enough and there is no need for a multitude of derivative projects. Back said, “I think it's like TCP/IP the internet exists. We don't need 5800 TCP/IP copies trying to monetize and profiteer off pumpanomics or such. It detracts from value (I gather there are about 5,800 altcoins as of today)”. He noted that innovators should focus on Bitcoin instead: “It's modular, you can build anything you want using it, if you're trying to innovate, go ahead and innovate”, …
Bitcoin / Aug. 11, 2020
Original Blockchain & Bitcoin: Different Paths to Decentralization
Blockchain co-inventor, Scott Stornetta discusses why Satoshi’s Bitcoin (BTC) design diverted from his implementation of blockchain. In our previous articles, we described Stornetta’s views on Satoshi’s background and the philosophical evidence of why Stornetta could have been Satoshi. Now, we focus on an important design difference between the original blockchain that Stornetta created with longtime partner Stuart Haber and Satoshi’s Bitcoin. Block rotation vs. validation rotation In the original blockchain, there was no rotation of the block producers. Instead, block validation was decentralized. Also, since there was no built-in cryptocurrency, the reward was paid out in cash. Stornetta believes that …
Decentralization / May 4, 2020
Craig Wright Abandons Libel Suit Against Adam Back, Pays All Legal Fees
Crag Wright, the self-proclaimed Satoshi Nakamoto and chief scientist at NChain, has dropped a libel lawsuit against Adam Back over the Blockstream chief executive’s assertion that Wright was fraudulent in claiming to be the creator of Bitcoin (BTC). Wright filed the complaint alongside similar suits targeting Ethereum cofounder Vitalik Buterin, Bitcoin.com founder Roger Ver, podcaster Peter McCormack, and Twitter user ‘Hodlnaut’ one year ago. Craig Wright drops libel suit against Blockstream CEO On April 12, Adam Back tweeted that Craig Wright had abandoned his libel suit. Back stated that Wright’s representation “declined to give any explanation of why Craig retracted.” …
Bitcoin / April 13, 2020