UK financial watchdog extends registration deadline for some crypto firms

Published at: March 30, 2022

The Financial Conduct Authority, the United Kingdom’s financial regulator, has extended the temporary registration status of some firms offering crypto services beyond its March 31 deadline.

In a Tuesday statement, the FCA said “a small number of firms” in the crypto space will continue to have temporary registration status in the U.K. “where it is strictly necessary.” The financial regulator reiterated that temporarily exempting the crypto firms from its previously announced March 31 deadline “does not mean that the FCA has assessed them as fit and proper” but included situations in which a company “may be pursuing an appeal” or was still in the process of winding down operations.

“Only firms that are registered with us or on our list of firms with temporary registration can continue trading,” said the FCA. “Other firms must have ceased trading from 10 January 2021. Firms that have not ceased trading are at risk of being subject to the FCA’s criminal and civil enforcement powers.”

The FCA has approved registrations from 33 crypto companies since August 2020 in compliance with U.K. laws covering anti-money laundering, combating the financing of terrorism, and handling transfers of funds. In addition, the financial regulator granted temporary registration status to several companies until March 31, at which time the FCA was expected to reach a decision on the validity of their applications.

As of March 25, there were 12 firms permitted to “carry out cryptoasset activities” under this FCA temporary status, including CEX.IO, Revolut, and Copper. The financial watchdog did not specify a new deadline for the firm’s registration to be approved or rejected, but previously extended the review period from July 2021 to March 2022.

Related: FCA reiterates power to 'suspend or cancel' crypto firms' registrations following Bifinity concerns

Many crypto firms withdrew FCA registration applications following the regulator seeming to crack down on AML and CFT compliance in 2020. On March 13, the FCA ordered Bitcoin ATM operators to “shut down or face further action,” citing the lack of regulatory structure and the volatility of certain assets in addition to AML concerns.

Tags
Regulation
Cryptocurrency Exchange
Cryptocurrencies
Law
United Kingdom
Related Posts
13 more crypto firms withdraw licensing applications in the UK
The United Kingdom Financial Conduct Authority’s (FCA) crypto licensing regime is reportedly proving arduous for cryptocurrency businesses looking to operate in the country. According to a Reuters report on Tuesday, the number of withdrawn licensing applications from crypto businesses increased by over 25% in June. Indeed, Cointelegraph reported near the beginning of the month that 51 crypto firms had withdrawn earlier submitted filings for registration with the FCA. An FCA spokesperson quoted by Reuters said that 13 more companies have pulled out of the approval process, bringing the total number of withdrawals to 64. Since January 2020, the FCA has …
Regulation / June 29, 2021
Crypto regulations in the United Kingdom: Are we there yet?
Policymaking in the United Kingdom is typically reactionary, and this is no less true in the context of the crypto-asset industry. Reactionary policymaking means that the U.K.’s crypto regime is occasionally behind those of its competitors, which could ultimately cause the U.K. to become a less attractive place to conduct crypto-related business. The former Chair of CryptoUK, Iqbal Gandham, pointed out in an April 2018 letter to the U.K. Parliament’s Treasury Committee that despite the fact that “the UK holds great potential to become a global leader in cryptocurrencies,” the “absence of regulatory direction” has stifled innovation in the industry. …
Adoption / Sept. 28, 2020
The perils of suing crypto exchanges after ransomware attacks
In October 2019, unknown hackers infiltrated a Canadian insurance company by installing the malware BitPaymer, which encrypted the firm’s data and IT systems. The hackers demanded a ransom of $1.2 million be paid in Bitcoin (BTC) in return for the decryption software needed for the firm to regain access to its systems. The firm’s United Kingdom-based insurer — known only as AA — arranged to pay the BTC ransom, and the firm’s systems were back up and running within a few days. Meanwhile, AA started the process of seeking legal avenues to recover the BTC obtained by the hackers. It …
Bitcoin / April 18, 2021
Number of UK crypto firms operating under FCA temporary registration status drops
The number of firms permitted to offer crypto services to U.K. residents under temporary registration status from the Financial Conduct Authority has dropped from 12 to 5. According to a Thursday update to its list of ‘Cryptoasset firms with Temporary Registration’, the United Kingdom’s financial regulator named CEX.IO, Revolut, Copper, Globalblock, and Moneybrain as companies in the crypto space allowed to operate in the country in addition to the 34 registered cryptoasset firms the FCA approved since August 2020. The FCA said on March 30 that it would be extending the temporary registration status for “a small number of firms …
Regulation / April 8, 2022
Regulators have a weak case against FTX on deposit insurance
In a cease-and-desist letter to fast-growing crypto exchange FTX, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) shed light on a now-deleted tweet from the exchange’s president, Brett Harrison, and issued a stark warning over the company’s messaging. Harrison’s original tweet said, “Direct deposits from employers to FTX US are stored in individually FDIC-insured bank accounts in the users’ names.” He added, “Stocks are held in FDIC-insured and SIPC [Security Investor Protection Corporation]-insured brokerage accounts.” Although Harrison stewarded FTX to its best-ever year in 2021, increasing revenue by 1,000%, the firm now faces the unenviable prospect of running afoul of a powerful …
Regulation / Aug. 26, 2022