SEC Seeks Early Judgement in Lawsuit Over Kik’s $100M ICO

Published at: March 21, 2020

The United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has requested an early summary judgment in its lawsuit against Kik over the messaging company’s $100 million KIN initial coin offering (ICO) during 2017.

The SEC first brought its case against Kik in June 2019. The commission argued that the company’s ICO comprised a clear issuance of securities. While Kik has sought to claim that KIN comprises a currency and not a security, the SEC claims to have “undisputed evidence” to the contrary. The SEC states that:

“Kik’s 2017 offer and sale of Kin was an offer and sale of investment contracts to the public, which was not registered with the SEC, and for which there was no exemption from registration under the act.” 

Kik sold over half a trillion tokens to investors outside of Canada and raised $100 million via its ICO during September 2017.

Kik accused of distributing unlicensed securities

The commission alleges that Kik blatantly informed investors that KIN prices would increase alongside growing demand for the tokens — comprising a naked violation of the Securities Act through cultivating an expectation for profit among investors. 

The SEC also noted that the company assured would-be contributors that it would “undertake crucial work to spur that demand.”

SEC seeks permanent injunction against Kik

The SEC asserted that the structure of Kik’s offering “deprived thousands of investors the protections and required disclosures under the federal securities laws.” 

The commission is seeking a permanent injunction against the Canadian company, in addition to penalties, disgorgement of Kiks “ill-gotten gains,” in addition to interest.

The regulator argued that Kik’s “pivot” into digital token issuance was motivated by years of losses incurred from its free messaging service. 

Lawsuit exacerbates Kik's financial difficulties

The lawsuit has further compounded Kik’s economic woes, with the company announcing it would shut down its free messaging service during September last year. 

The messaging platform was bought by U.S.-based firm MediaLab the following month.

Tags
Regulation
United States
Sec
Ico
Kik
Related Posts
SEC versus Kik: SAFTs are far from safe
On the last day of September 2020, Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein dashed the hopes of Kik Interactive, crypto entrepreneurs and Simple Agreement for Future Tokens, or SAFT, proponents in general by ruling in favor of the U.S. Securities Exchange Commission’s motion for summary judgment in SEC v. Kik Interactive. The case was instigated by the SEC in June 2019 when the SEC filed an enforcement action against Kik Interactive Inc., (referred to in the complaint and here as Kik), a social media company that had used SAFT to launch its “Kin” crypto token in September 2017. Related: Does Kik stand …
Technology / Oct. 4, 2020
Court rules Kik’s 2017 ICO violated U.S. securities laws
U.S. District Judge Alvin Kellerstein has sided with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), ruling that the Canadian technology firm Kik’s $100 million initial coin offering (ICO) violated federal securities laws. On September 30, Judge Kellerstein responded to both parties’ requests for summary judgment, determining that Kik’s 2017 token sale meets the definition of a securities issuance according to the Howey test, as the ICO participants had a reasonable expectation of profit. “In public statements and at public events promoting Kin, Kik extolled Kin’s profit-making potential. Kik’s CEO explained the role of supply and demand in driving the value …
Regulation / Oct. 1, 2020
Kik and SEC Oppose Each Other’s Motions for Summary Judgment
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, and Kik Interactive have both filed oppositions to each other's motions for summary judgment on April 24. While Kik claims its offerings were exempt from registration requirements, the SEC asserts Kik’s 2017 initial coin offering (ICO) comprised a clear violation of securities laws. Kik and SEC battle it out over Howey Test Kik maintains that the SEC has failed to provide sufficient evidence that it cultivated the expectation of profits among its customers, or that Kik’s investors entered into a common enterprise with the company — two of the Howey Test’s three …
Regulation / April 26, 2020
Blockchain Association Weighs in on SEC Case Against Kik’s ICO
The United States-based Blockchain Association has filed an amicus curiae brief in support of Canadian messenger Kik amid the firm’s legal battle with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The association addressed the April 17 brief to the court which is considering the case, asking it to deny the SEC’s motion for summary judgment and decide the case narrowly to avoid casting doubt on cryptocurrency projects that have yet to appear before the court. In March, the SEC requested summary judgment, claiming that it possessed “undisputed evidence” that Kik’s ICO distributed unlicensed securities. Not the same as Telegram’s case Basically, the …
Regulation / April 21, 2020
SEC Commissioner Peirce Asks ‘Who Did We Protect?’ in Telegram Shutdown
In her July 21 speech for Blockchain Week Singapore, Securities and Exchange Commissioner Hester Peirce, known among the industry as ‘CryptoMom,’ spoke out on her opposition to the SEC’s recently concluded suit against Telegram. SEC action against Telegram served neither investors nor mission Peirce’s speech, entitled “Not Braking and Breaking,” emphasized the roles and responsibilities of regulators regarding innovation, particularly in the light of the case against Telegram that came to an end in June. Telegram had sold $1.7 billion in contracts for GRAM tokens, which would be the native token of the Telegram Open Network. As preface, the commissioner …
Regulation / July 21, 2020