Congressman Calls Digital Dollar Hearing 'Encouraging,' but Look Out for Privacy

Published at: June 12, 2020

In a June 11 hearing before the Congressional Fintech Task Force, everyone seemed to agree that they could improve financial inclusion by giving people more direct access to FedAccounts, which may operate using a digital dollar. What exactly a digital dollar looks like will probably be more controversial.

Unity at yesterday’s hearing was encouraging 

Congressman Warren Davidson (R-OH), a member of the Fintech Task Force as well as a noted crypto advocate, was pleased with the tone of the hearing, overall. He was at earlier hearings for Facebook’s Libra, which he saw as turning into an indictment of Facebook rather than a conversation about crypto.  

“It’s not really partisan in terms of where people are on this issue,” Davidson told Cointelegraph. “It was encouraging to have a meeting where it’s not an outright rejection of it because it’s a threat to the dollar — because it is the dollar.” 

In earlier conversations, Democrat members of the Financial Services Committee were especially concerned about crypto as a threat to U.S. sovereignty. Referring to Chairwoman of the full committee Maxine Waters (D-CA), who authored a bill central to yesterday’s conversation, Davidson said:

“The fact that a version of this was included in the previous Democrat bill says that for some this is a priority, including the Chairwoman.”  

Privacy remains a concern

Davidson was especially concerned that what everyone is talking about when it comes to a “digital dollar” did not include some of the key advantages of the existing dollar, including privacy and autonomy: “That’s the strength of cash, you have to have that characteristic that you’re not really filtering transactions.” 

Consequently, Davidson thinks that reaching consensus as to what a dollar means will take more time:

“I think there’s still a long way to go until a shared vision of what this would look like. For me, the momentum on so many of these issues seems to be to further erode privacy that, if we do it, we do it somewhat the opposite, that we reclaim some of the privacy that’s been lost. That’s the beauty of blockchain.” 

Along the same lines, Kristin Smith of the Blockchain Association noted, “For policymakers, it’s important to know that the term ‘digital dollar’ means different things to different people.”

In advance of the hearing, witness and former CFTC Chairman J. Christopher Giancarlo told Cointelegraph to look out for the range of expertise among the task force:

“There are members that are really far afield in their thinking about blockchain technology, distributed ledger technology. And in crypto assets and a U.S. CBDC, there are others who are more focused on specific concerns of privacy, of security.”

Tags
Law
Related Posts
Law Decoded: Dead Men Face No Charges, June 6-12
Editor’s note: These are times strange enough that every conversation seems to include some verbal acknowledgment like “strange times, huh?” A quasi-anarchist police-free leftist separatist bubble has formed and is growing on Seattle’s Capitol Hill — a sentence that resembles a David Foster Wallace plot more than anything I ever anticipated treating as news. Both India and Russia have been hemming and hawing over long-discussed crypto bans, while the latter will be voting on controversial constitutional amendments allowing Vladimir Putin to extend his already 20-year term as president of the Russian Federation. This vote will reportedly be happening on a …
Regulation / June 12, 2020
Law Decoded: Big Tech, Central Banks and the Hunt for Monopolies, July 24-31
Every Friday, Law Decoded delivers analysis on the week’s critical stories in the realms of policy, regulation and law. Editor’s note The concept of monopoly will reign in today’s Law Decoded. As a fundamental principle, blockchain technology is about distributing both inputs and outputs of information securely. In its still very young lifecycle, the technology has proven to have boundless applications on the basis of this fairly simple principle. A secondary principle is decentralization, and in this way, blockchain technology seems inherently opposed to monopolies. The big challenge of Bitcoin’s white paper was finding a way to move value across …
Regulation / July 31, 2020
Law Decoded: First-mover advantage in a CBDC conversation, Jan. 10–17
Last week saw an unlikely first move in the opening narrative battle around a prospective U.S. central bank digital currency: Congressperson Tom Emmer came forward with an initiative to legally restrict the Federal Reserve’s capacity to issue a retail CBDC and take on the role of a retail bank. This could be massively consequential as we are yet to see a similarly sharp-cut expression of an opposing stance. As a matter of fact, it is not even clear whether other U.S. lawmakers have strong opinions on the matter other than, perhaps, condemning privately issued stablecoins as a digital alternative to …
Regulation / Jan. 17, 2022
U.S. Congressman calls for ‘Broad, bipartisan consensus’ on important issues of digital asset policy
In a letter to the leadership of the United States House Financial Services Committee, ranking member Patrick McHenry took a jab at “inconsistent treatment and jurisdictional uncertainty” inherent in U.S. crypto regulation and called for the Committee to take on its critical issues. McHenry, a Republican representing North Carolina, opened by mentioning that the Committee’s Democrat Chairwoman Maxine Waters is looking to schedule additional hearings addressing matters pertinent to the digital asset industry. He further stressed the need for identifying and prioritizing the key issues and achieving a “broad, bipartisan consensus” on the matters affecting the industry that holds immense …
Regulation / Jan. 25, 2022
China releases final anti-monopoly rules targeting major tech and payments firms
China has finalized new guidelines to aid in antitrust battle against tech giants. On Feb. 7, the State Administration for Market Regulation released finalized rules for its anti-monopoly push against e-commerce and payments giants like Alibaba, Ant Group and Tencent. The guidance specifically addresses "operators that provide business premises, transaction matching, information exchange and other Internet platform services." It builds on a host of recent efforts by both the SAMR and the People's Bank of China to rein in the broader tech industry, specifically targeting payments platforms as the country continues to push forward its own central bank digital currency. …
Regulation / Feb. 8, 2021