Court Denies SEC Request to Make Telegram Reveal ICO Bank Records

Published at: Jan. 7, 2020

The District Court for the Southern District of New York has denied a request by the United States’ securities regulator to make Telegram reveal its bank records.

According to a Jan. 6 court order signed by Judge P. Kevin Caste, the court has denied an application by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to “compel the production of defendant’s bank records.” 

Telegram must prove that its bank records comply with data privacy laws

The new court decision refers to a Jan. 2 application by the SEC to compel Telegram to share the details of how the firm spent $1.7 billion raised in its initial coin offering (ICO) in 2018. On Jan. 4, Telegram’s lawyers officially requested that the application be thrown out, calling it an “unfounded fishing expedition.”

Despite the court deciding in favor of Telegram, the company will still have to prove that its bank records comply with foreign data privacy laws. The court order reads:

“The Court denies, without prejudice, plaintiff’s application to compel the production of defendant’s bank records. By January 9, 2020, defendant shall set forth in a declaration a proposed schedule for a review of the requested bank records to ensure that production of such records complies with foreign data privacy laws.”

Telegram releases public notice on its products

The court’s decision came on the same day that Telegram released a series of summaries about its Telegram Open Network (TON) and corresponding Gram tokens. In the post, the firm noted that it has been careful not to acknowledge spurious claims about its products in order to comply with relevant laws:

“Telegram has been careful not to speak publicly about these rumors while we continue to build the TON Blockchain platform and work out the exact details of the project to ensure that the TON Blockchain and Grams can operate in a way that is compliant with all relevant laws and regulations.”

The company also emphasized that Gram is not an investment product, once again implying that the token is not a security and is outside of the SEC’s jurisdiction.

The SEC’s request to reveal Telegram’s ICO records is part of the regulator’s emergency action against Telegram that was initially filed in October 2019, a few weeks before TON was scheduled to launch. 

As the launch of the network has been put on hold indefinitely, the SEC and Telegram continue to argue on the status of Gram token. While the SEC believes that Gram is security, Telegram claims that Grams will merely be a currency or commodity once TON is active.

Telegram CEO Pavel Durov is expected to give a deposition in the case on Jan. 7 or 8, 2020, according to a court order issued in November 2019.

Tags
Sec
Law
USA
Ton
Related Posts
Telegram Founder Pavel Durov to Give Deposition in Gram Token Case
In the latest chapter of Telegram's legal battle with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the firm’s founder Pavel Durov will give a deposition along with two Telegram employees. On Nov. 25, District Judge P. Kevin Castel of the New York Southern District Court ruled that the deposition will take place on Jan. 7 or 8, 2020, at a location agreed upon by the relevant parties. Ilya Perekopsky, vice-president of Telegram, will testify as well. Perekopsky’s deposition is set for Dec. 16, 2019. The deposition of Shyam Parekh, a Telegram employee engaged in the $1.7 billion Gram (GRAM) …
Sec / Nov. 26, 2019
Blockchain Association Supports Telegram in Legal Battle With SEC
The Blockchain Association has filed an amicus curiae brief in response to litigation against Telegram initiated by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The Blockchain Association, a collective of advocates involved with the blockchain industry, filed an amicus curiae brief with the court of the Southern District of New York on Jan. 21. An amicus curiae is an entity that does not participate in specific litigation, but has a right to advise the court regarding some matter of law directly concerning the lawsuit. Need for more clarity from the SEC In the letter, the association disputes the charges …
Blockchain / Jan. 22, 2020
BNY Mellon and Credit Suisse Involved in Telegram’s $1.7B Sale: Report
Two global financial giants, BNY Mellon and Credit Suisse, were reportedly involved in Telegram’s $1.7 billion Gram (GRAM) token sale in 2018. Telegram allegedly informed its investors that it was using BNY Mellon and Credit Suisse to move and store fiat currency raised in the GRAM sale, industry publication Coindesk reports, citing court filings released on Dec. 10. A Telegram employee reveals the details in a series of messages attached to the filings Shyam Parekh, a Telegram employee who is expected to give a deposition before the New York Southern District Court today, Dec. 10, reportedly provided details on how …
Blockchain / Dec. 10, 2019
Telegram Responds to Investors on SEC Action, Hearing Set for Oct. 24
Telegram Open Network (TON) developers responded to its investors after American regulators abruptly announced that its $1.7 billion token sale was illegal. No clear feedback from SEC for 18 months According to a TON letter to investors obtained by Cointelegraph, the firm has been trying to solicit feedback from the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for the past 18 months regarding the TON blockchain and does not agree with the recent action. It wrote: “We were surprised and disappointed that the SEC chose to file the lawsuit under these circumstances, and we disagree with the SEC's legal position.” …
United States / Oct. 13, 2019
US Court Temporarily Freezes $8M in Response to SEC Request Yesterday
A United States District Court has entered an emergency freeze to preserve $8 million of a New York citizen and two of his entities’ related assets following the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) complaint filed on Aug. 12. Per the SEC's announcement published on Aug. 13, the court ordered the temporary freeze of at least $8 million of the $14.8 million raised by the defendants. The sum was reportedly raised by Reginald Middleton and two entities under his management, Veritaseum, Inc. and Veritaseum, LLC, in 2017 and 2018 by conducting an allegedly fraudulent and unregistered initial coin offering. The …
United States / Aug. 13, 2019