YouTuber accused of engineering multi-million-dollar pump-n-dump via Uniswap

Published at: July 6, 2021

An ex-Google tech lead and YouTuber with more than 1.1 million subscribers has been accused of engineering a multi-million-dollar “pump-and-dump” scheme.

Patrick Shyu, known pseudonymously as TechLead on YouTube, launched the Million token (MM) via an initial DEX offering on leading decentralized exchange Uniswap on Thursday.

The project’s website describes Million as a pre-mined cryptocurrency with a fixed supply of 1 million tokens that are backed by one USD Coin (USDC) each per token. The website emphasizes that despite only being backed by $1 million worth of stablecoins, MM has “no maximum value.”

After being priced at $1.00 on launch, MM saw a mammoth 3,500% increase within just three days to hit $36.87 on Sunday. The price has since crashed, declining by 58% to sit around $15.26 at the time of writing.

The immediate crash that followed Million’s price high has led to accusations the project is a pump-and-dump on Twitter, with user DCF GOD highlighting the large sums of liquidity that had been pulled from Uniswap by the same address that minted MM tokens.

“By removing liquidity and not selling, he’s effectively selling without ‘selling.’ This way he doesn’t have to tell the community that he sold while they all bought, he just has to hold his initial promise of keeping 1m of usdc liquidity,” they argued.

Okay last tweet since I have folks telling me I don't know how uniswap worksYou can ignore all the liquidity stuff and just compare balancesTechlead start balance:- 1M $USDC- 1M $MMTechlead current balance:- 3M $USDC- about 113k $MMHe has sold MM and gained $2M

— DCF GOD (@dcfgod) July 5, 2021

Shyu responded to the thread, labeling it “absolute FUD,” arguing, “This is literally how liquidity works in Uniswap V3 [...] liquidity ranges are created, you literally cannot do it any other way.”

Popular commentator ChainlinkGod.eth 2.0 commented that TechLead had completely missed DCF’s point, stating, “You’ve created a ‘get rich quick’ scheme so you can dump on your followers, you’ve added liquidity when the price is low and removed it when the price was high and profited the difference in $USDC.”

Related: CoinMarketCap launches Ethereum token swaps powered by Uniswap

Shyu published a YouTube video on Tuesday addressing the accusations, denying that he “rug-pulled” investors by removing liquidity. However, the YouTuber also emphasized that MM “should not be considered an investment,” describing the project as a “social experiment”:

“Million tokens should not be considered an investment by any means. This is a social experiment and really pure speculation. It’s kind of a game for us to see what happens with this, kind of like Dogecoin.”
Tags
Related Posts
As Patreon tests the waters, can crypto open doors for content creators?
As the digital asset market continues to break new ground, seemingly with each passing day, there is no denying the fact that crypto adoption has continued to increase at a fairly rapid pace globally. In this regard, it now appears as though online content creator platform Patreon is actively looking to devise its very own social token — or “creator coin” as it likes to call it — as a way of diving into the world of cryptocurrencies. Patreon executives recently teased the idea at the 2021 Creator Economy Summit with CEO Jack Conte making an appearance alongside chief product …
Adoption / Nov. 13, 2021
‘I've done nothing wrong’ — Lark Davis denies ‘pump-and-dump’ allegations
Crypto influencer Lark Davis has refuted new allegations from Twitter “on-chain sleuth” ZachXBT of shilling “low cap projects” to his audience “just to dump them shortly after.” Davis was responding to a Twitter thread posted by Zach on Sept. 29, containing allegations that he profited over $1.2 million through selling tokens from crypto projects which he was allegedly paid to promote without disclosing. In a 17-part thread, Zach pointed to eight examples of what is supposedly Davis’ crypto wallet receiving tokens from new crypto projects, with Davis subsequently tweeting or posting a video on them, and then selling the tokens …
Defi / Sept. 30, 2022
Valour Uniswap exchange-traded product to increase UNI exposure
Valour, a Zurich-based exchange-traded products (ETP) issuer, announced the launch of a fully-backed investment product to increase exposure to Uniswap decentralized exchange’s native token, UNI. The UNI token serves as the underlying asset within the Valour Uniswap ETP offering available as a fully-backed passive investment product. The Uniswap ETP was launched on a European stock exchange named Boerse Frankfurt Zertifikate AG, the Frankfurt Stock Exchange co-owner. Valour CEO Diana Biggs highlighted the inaccessibility of blockchain-based investment products on traditional markets and stock exchanges. Speaking about Valour Uniswap ETP’s position in making DeFi investments available via mainstream investment channels, he said: …
Adoption / Oct. 26, 2021
Boson Protocol seeks to blend physical and digital marketplaces in the Metaverse
Boson Protocol is a decentralized commerce protocol that seeks to enable the sale of physical goods, services and experiences in the Metaverse as nonfungible tokens (NFTs), and hopes to provide an infrastructure layer for exchanging assets of non-monetary value. For example, an NFT of a pair of sneakers bought using the Boson Protocol in the Metaverse would then be redeemable for that physical pair of sneakers in the real world, and vice versa. Ahead of the launch of its first Metaverse commerce experience in Decentraland, called Boson Portal, Cointelegraph spoke with Justin Banon, co-founder of Boson Protocol, to learn more …
Adoption / Nov. 18, 2021
UNI tokens delegation was a "misunderstood situation" according to Binance's CZ
The millions oF UNI tokens delegated by Binance were a "misunderstood situation", said Binance CEO Changpeng “CZ” Zhao on a Twitter's post, in response to questions about 13.2 million UNI tokens delegated on Oct. 18 that made Binance the second-largest entity by voting power in the Uniswap DAO. According to CZ, a UNI transfer between internal wallets caused the automatic delegation, denying allegations about the crypto exchange using user's tokens to vote. UNI transferred between internal Binance wallets, causing the UNI to be automatically delegated. This is part of their protocol, not "we intended". Binance don't vote with user’s tokens. …
Business / Oct. 20, 2022