Tax professional explains the most important thing for US crypto holders

Published at: Oct. 29, 2020

Wendy Walker, solution principal at the tax compliance company Sovos, described reporting as the most important aspect of tax filing that people in the blockchain industry should know about. 

"Even if you don't owe income taxes, you still have to report details of the transactions," Walker told Cointelegraph in an interview. "I think that's probably one of the key things about this moving of the question to the front of the 1040" she said, referencing the IRS' recent updates to the 1040 income tax form.

This update requires citizens to disclose whether they've handled crypto assets during the filing year, asking "At any time during 2019, did you receive, sell, send, exchange, or otherwise acquire any financial interest in any virtual currency?"

Checking this box is just the tip of the iceberg for those involved in crypto, however. Crypto often involves transactions, buying, selling, fees, multiple storage locations and a plethora of other information that may apply to tax filing requirements in one form or another. Given the complications involved, is taxation currently even plausible in crypto? Walker thinks so, but says the IRS also has some catching up to do. 

"Although this guidance has been coming out over the last year and we've seen enforcement, the IRS really hasn't understood crypto," Walker said. The U.S. tax agency has come forward with a number of attempted clarifications and rulings around crypto taxation since 2019. Such efforts, however, have shown the entity's lack of industry knowledge in some ways.  

"While they're doing all this enforcement, they're also kind of learning about it at the same time unfortunately," Walker said. She specifically mentioned tax guideline difficulties when it comes to crypto transfers between exchanges, citing a lack of related documentation. There is also something of a gray area for digital assets classified as commodities, securities, or otherwise. 

U.S. regulatory authorities have made some headway on these classifications, though many crypto assets still remain ill-defined.

Tags
Related Posts
Crypto language in the infrastructure bill is a political shell game, says Cointelegraph GC
Zachary Kelman, general counsel of Cointelegraph, said that the political fight over the tax implications for crypto in the United States infrastructure bill is nothing new, as it’s likely about how lawmakers plan to pay for everything. In an interview with Cointelegraph's Jackson DuMont, Kelman claimed that senators pushing the crypto language in the infrastructure bill — which ultimately passed in the U.S. Senate after one senator objected to a clarifying amendment — may have been more influenced by political concerns than ones potentially affecting the crypto space. Namely, the general counsel claimed that lawmakers know that crypto firms “can't …
Regulation / Aug. 18, 2021
Senators add crypto taxes to infrastructure deal to raise $28B in extra revenue
Last-minute additions to the bipartisan infrastructure deal in the United States Senate saw lawmakers propose expanded cryptocurrency taxation to raise an additional $28 billion in revenue. The proposal will implement tighter rules on businesses handling crypto, expand reporting requirements for brokers, and mandate that digital asset transactions worth more than $10,000 are reported to the Internal Revenue Service. Senator Rob Portman noted that Congress has expressed concerns regarding crypto reporting and taxation requirements for some time: “Everybody’s been talking about the appropriate way to provide more reporting in particular and that leads to better compliance.” The crypto measures were hastily …
Regulation / July 29, 2021
South Korea Could Issue a Crypto Capital Gains Tax as High as 20%
South Korean private sector members recently discussed a crypto-related taxation bill meant to establish capital gains tax for cryptocurrencies. During these discussions on July 13, members indicated crypto gains taxes could rise as high as 20%. Cryptocurrencies could be considered as “goods” Proposed amendments to existing laws also plan to classify cryptocurrencies as “goods,” rather than currencies. Lawmakers have established that virtual assets can be considered as electronic certificates of economic value that can be traded electronically. However, when the transactions are for sales purposes, it could be viewed as an asset. A South Korean court referenced Bitcoin (BTC) in …
Bitcoin / July 13, 2020
IRS Tax Warnings on Ethereum’s Fifth Anniversary
As important as Ethereum has become, even eclipsing Bitcoin (BTC) in some circles, it is no wonder that its fifth birthday has prompted comments — some prophetic, others nostalgic. Few, however, will mark the occasion by thinking about taxes, but that could be shortsighted. The last five years have seen near-tectonic shifts in how investors, exchanges and government agencies see cryptocurrencies. The Internal Revenue Service, or IRS, is at the top of the heap when it comes to tax enforcement. This is plainly true in the United States, and it is increasingly true worldwide, too. In 2008, the IRS and …
Regulation / Aug. 5, 2020
Law Decoded: India ponders going full China on crypto, Nov. 22–29
Are big emerging economies more likely to gravitate toward blanket crypto bans? China has set a precedent, and now it appears as if India could be weighing a similar policy direction: A bill containing a proposed ban on all “private cryptocurrencies” will go in front of the nation’s parliament sometime this winter. The measure is designed to clear the way for India’s central bank to advance its digital currency agenda. Whether a sovereign central bank digital currency can coexist with a thriving market of “private” cryptos will be one of the central questions of the looming CBDC age, and it …
Regulation / Nov. 29, 2021