Trading app Robinhood settles SEC charges for $65 million

Published at: Dec. 17, 2020

Robinhood has staved off a suit from the Securities and Exchange Commission by agreeing to pay $65 million.

The trading app, which takes its name from the English folk hero who stole from the rich to give to the poor, made its name by making investing simpler for newcomers. Per a Thursday announcement from the SEC, Robinhood deceived its users as to where its money was actually coming from between 2015 and 2018, citing:

"Material misrepresentations and omissions by Robinhood relating to its revenue sources, specifically its receipt of payments from certain principal trading firms, also known as electronic market makers, for routing Robinhood customer orders to them, and relating to certain statements about the execution quality Robinhood achieved for its customers’ orders."

The SEC's underlying Exchange Act does not prohibit broker-dealers like Robinhood from getting paid for directing orders through those principal trading firms, but it does require that those broker-dealers work to get their customers the best deal.

Indeed, the SEC said that Robinhood concealed the worse deal that customers were getting. The firm's initial pitch as a commission-free platform allowed the firm to hide similar costs in the form of higher execution prices on user orders: 

"One of Robinhood’s primary selling points was that it did not charge its customers trading commissions. In reality, however, 'commission free' trading at Robinhood came with a catch: Robinhood’s customers received inferior execution prices compared to what they would have received from Robinhood’s competitors."

In its early years, Robinhood's overwhelming dependence on order flow payments — which the SEC alleged was up to 80% of the firm’s 2015 revenue — seems to have led the firm to overlook this duty to customers. 

In a message to Cointelegraph, Dan Gallagher, who head's Robinhood's legal team, said that the practices that resulted in today's settlement are well into the past:

“The settlement relates to historical practices that do not reflect Robinhood today. We recognize the responsibility that comes with having helped millions of investors make their first investments, and we’re committed to continuing to evolve Robinhood as we grow to meet our customers’ needs.”

Fortunately for Robinhood, 2020 has been extremely lucrative for such fintech platforms. With more people stuck at home and the stock market soaring above other means of making money, retail trading on consumer-friendly apps has picked up. The firm just saw a $660 million funding round in September.

At the same time, today's settlement does not appear to be the end of Robinhood's legal troubles. Just yesterday, reports emerged that Massachusetts securities regulators were looking to file a case against Robinhood for subjecting inexperienced investors to "unnecessary trading risks."

Tags
Sec
Law
Related Posts
Robinhood CEO calls on SEC to revise ‘outdated’ trading rules
United States lawmakers are set to grill Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev over the GameStop trading frenzy at a Congressional hearing later today. In his prepared remarks, Robinhood CEO appeared to place responsibility for the platform’s stock trading suspensions on the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Tenev said that the company blocked trading to meet “regulatory deposit requirements” defined by the SEC. The exec specifically criticized an SEC rule that requires equities transactions to clear over two days: “It takes several days for the clearinghouse to process the transaction [...] This is known as “T+2” settlement, denoting the trade date plus …
Regulation / Feb. 18, 2021
Stricter crypto laws will stifle innovation, says SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce
Hester Peirce of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission has once again urged regulators to take a step back from attempting to overregulate the crypto space. Speaking to Financial Times, Peirce, affectionately dubbed “Crypto Mom” due to her positive stance on cryptocurrencies, argued against the need for strict regulatory policies. According to Peirce, regulators by nature often have a knee-jerk reaction to emerging market spaces, often at the expense of innovation. The SEC commissioner warned that pursuing stricter regulatory policies eliminates the ability of market participants to carry out peer-to-peer transactions. Rather than emphasizing government regulations, Peirce advocates for …
Regulation / June 9, 2021
Law Decoded: Public companies, private markets, crypto offerings and you, Aug. 28–Sept. 4
Editor’s note It is a cruel twist of fate that during the first hiatus week in Law Decoded’s existence, the SEC put out long-awaited updates to accredited investor qualifications. Upon reading the news, your faithful and ever-vigilant policy editor put down his phone and cast a wistful eye upon the sun’s reflection dancing in the midground of the Atlantic Ocean. Bracing himself with a deep quaff of Corona, he thought ‘Not today.’ Before the sorrow of not being the one to bring the news to you could overwhelm him, he grabbed a battered borrowed surfboard and made for the waves. …
Regulation / Sept. 4, 2020
How the Democratic Party didn’t stop worrying and fearing crypto in 2021
As 2022 is kicking off, America nears the first anniversary of Joe Biden’s presidency. Following the tenure’s ambitious start, the last few months witnessed some serious tumult around the overall health of the United States economy, the administration’s handling of the COVID-19 pandemic, and the tense debate around Biden’s opus magnum — the $1.7 trillion Build Back Better infrastructure legislation plan. But even as the Democrats’ ability to maintain undivided power after the 2022 midterm elections can raise doubts, the party’s prevailing view of crypto has become more consolidated than ever. The incumbent president’s party will be setting the tone …
Regulation / Jan. 1, 2022
Crypto and securities: New interpretation of US Howey test gaining ground
The crypto community celebrated a victory in court on Jan. 30 when the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) admitted in the remedies hearing of the LBRY case that secondary sales of its LBC coin were not securities sales. John Deaton, who represents Ripple in court in the SEC’s case against it, was so excited that he created a video for his Twitter-hosted CryptoLawTV channel that evening. Deaton, a friend of the court, or amicus curiae, in the case, recounted a conversation he had with the judge that day. “Look, let’s not pretend. Secondary market sales are a problem,” …
Adoption / Feb. 9, 2023