SEC unable to locate BitConnect founder convicted in $2.4B fraud case

Published at: March 1, 2022

Indicted by the United States Department of Justice in a $2.4 billion Ponzi scheme, BitConnect founder Satish Kumbhani remains untraced following conviction.

In a court filing on Monday, the Securities and Exchange Commission said that the whereabouts of Kumbhani remains unknown. The SEC noted that Kumbhani’s last known location was in his native country India, but has remained untraced ever since the promoter for his BitConnect Ponzi scheme was charged by the SEC for defrauding American investors of over $2 billion.

SEC in its filing noted that the convicted founder has most probably fled to a foreign country and “Kumbhani’s location remains unknown, and the Commission remains unable to state when its efforts to locate him will be successful, if at all." The founder is charged with wire fraud, operating an unlicensed money transmitting business, and three conspiracies: committing wire fraud; commodity price manipulation; and international money laundering

Related: SEC charges 5 for illegally promoting $2 billion Bitconnect Ponzi scheme

The BitConnect saga dates back to ICO-era and was among the most highlighted and talked about projects at the time. Founded in 2016, the crypto project became a global sensation by mid-2017 as it raised billions of dollars from global investors. The project promised a lending program based on proprietary “trading bot" and “volatility software" that would offer 10% earning to investors via BCC token.

The DOJ charged Kumbhani for running a Ponzi scheme via BitConnect’s lending program where the project managed to siphon off $2.4 billion from investors. Bitconnect’s native token BCC recorded an all-time-high trading price of $463.31 at the peak of the market frenzy in December 2017 reaching a market cap of $3.4 billion. 

The founders rug pulled the project by January 2018, crashing the token price to near zero and causing massive losses to investors.

The DOJ also accused Kumbhani of creating fake market demand for BCC to lure more unsuspecting investors. The project like many others in the ICO era turned out to be a massive pyramid scheme where the creators used early funds to pay off old investors and later ran away after collecting billions based on hype and ICO craze. . Several promoters of the project across Australia and the U.S. have already been convicted and facing jail.

Tags
Sec
Related Posts
SEC closes in on settlements with US BitConnect promoters for millions
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is nearing settlements with four U.S.-based individuals accused of promoting the multi-billion dollar crypto Ponzi scheme, BitConnect. According to Law360, the terms of the settlements are currently awaiting final approval from Judge John Koeltl. The judge noted that while agreements’ terms are currently legally sound, minor fixes are needed to be made to ensure they are “scrupulously accurate.” The agreements include a more than $3 million settlement from Joshua Heppensen of Massachusetts and $576,000 from his fiancee Laura Mascola, $526,000 from Ryan Maasen of Oklahoma, and an unspecified amount from Michael Noble of …
Regulation / July 8, 2021
Indian police launch probe into BitConnect founder wanted by US SEC
The saga of BitConnect, a major cryptocurrency scam scheme, is taking another twist as one of the BitConnect co-founders is now wanted by the Indian state police. Satish Kumbhani, an Indian national and the alleged founder of the crypto Ponzi scheme BitConnect, reportedly became subject to a new police investigation in India, The Indian Express reported on Wednesday. The Pune police, operating under the Indian state Maharashtra Police, launched a probe into Kumbhani after a Pune-based lawyer filed a complaint claiming that he lost about 220 Bitcoin (BTC), or $5.2 million, due to BitConnect. The complainant said his original investment …
Bitcoin / Aug. 17, 2022
Exit Scam in Wonderland: Bitconnect’s Tentacles From Texas to Gujarat
An American musical prelude Bitconnect, the now-defunct crypto lending and exchange platform that has been ousted as a ruinous Ponzi scheme, has memorably been compared by the Silver Miller law firm to the fleeting 2011 Broadway musical “Wonderland,” based on the dizzying impossibilities of Alice’s adventures in Lewis Carroll’s celebrated novel. Silver Miller’s first class action complaint was filed on behalf of six defrauded Bitconnect investors in late January, just weeks after the Texas Securities Commissioner issued an emergency cease-and-desist order against Bitconnect for the selling of unlicensed securities. The complaint unconventionally opened with the following lyrics: “Welcome to Wonderland …
Blockchain / Sept. 22, 2018
DOJ indicts BitConnect’s Indian founder for $2.4B crypto Ponzi scheme
The founder of the infamous crypto exchange BitConnect, Satish Kumbhani, has been charged for allegedly misleading investors globally and defrauding them of $2.4 billion in the process. According to the Department of Justice (DOJ), a San Diego-based federal grand jury specifically charged Kumbhani for orchestrating the alleged Ponzi scheme via BitConnect’s “Lending Program”: “BitConnect operated as a Ponzi scheme by paying earlier BitConnect investors with money from later investors. In total, Kumbhani and his co-conspirators obtained approximately $2.4 billion from investors.” Back in 2017 amid the hype, BitConnect (BCC) recorded an all-time high of $463.31 in trading price, which according …
Blockchain / Feb. 26, 2022
Charges laid over alleged ‘crypto mining’ Ponzis that netted $8.4M
United States prosecutors have laid charges in two separate cases against nine people who founded or promoted a pair of cryptocurrency companies alleged to be Ponzi schemes that netted $8.4 million from investors. On Dec. 14 the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York unsealed the indictment, alleging the purported crypto mining and trading companies IcomTech and Forcount promised investors “guaranteed daily returns” that could double their investment in six months. In reality, prosecutors say both firms were using the money from later investors to pay earlier investors, while other funds were spent on promoting the companies …
Regulation / Dec. 16, 2022