Hong Kong’s Securities Regulator Issues Detailed Guidance for Security Token Offerings

Published at: March 29, 2019

Hong Kong's securities regulator, the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) has issued official guidance on security token offerings (STOs), in a statement published on March 28.

The guidance aims to clarify the legal and regulatory requirements for parties engaging in STO-related activities. The document opens with a proposed working definition of a security token and sale, noting that:

“STOs typically refer to specific offerings which are structured to have features of traditional securities offerings, and involve Security Tokens which are digital representations of ownership of assets (eg, gold or real estate) or economic rights (eg, a share of profits or revenue) utilising blockchain technology.”

According to the SFC, security tokens are “likely to be ‘securities’” under Hong Kong’s Securities and Futures Ordinance, and thus fall under existing securities laws.

Unless an exemption applies, this therefore means that any Hong Kong-based STO — or STO targeting Hong Kong investors — must acquire a license and register for dealing in securities under the provisions of the ordinance.

Engaging in securities dealing (defined as a “Type 1 regulated activity”) without a due license is a criminal offense, the SFC notes.

Intermediaries that intend to market or operate an STO are also required to comply with the existing Code of Conduct for entities that are licensed or registered with the securities regulator. The statement also notes that security tokens are deemed to be "complex products," for which additional investor protection measures further apply.

Lastly, the SFC states that prospective STO operators are required to observe the guidance it has previously outlined in a November 2018 circular for crypto exchanges and intermediaries engaged in the distribution of virtual asset funds.

This guidance stipulated three points. First, observing the aforementioned license and registration requirements, as well as an explicit restriction of STO sales to professional investors only.

Second, intermediaries are required to conduct due diligence in order to develop a thorough understanding of the STO in question. Intermediaries are also tasked with ensuring that any information provided to investors is sound and not misleading.

Lastly, they are required to provide investors with transparent information, as well as to issue warnings that outline the risks associated with virtual asset investments.

In the United States context, multiple crypto industry figures and lawmakers have called on the country’s securities regulator to provide greater regulatory clarity for blockchain-based tokens.

Tags
Sto
Ico
Related Posts
Report: SEC Expands Crackdown on ICOs, Regulatory Ambiguity Remains
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has expanded its crackdown on Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs), putting “hundreds” of projects at risk, according to a recent joint investigation by Yahoo Finance and Decrypt Media published, Oct. 10. The authors of the report stressed that hundreds of crypto and blockchain startups that conducted token sales have eventually found that they had violated securities laws despite their endeavors to comply with regulations. In response to SEC pressure, dozens of firms have reportedly “quietly agreed” to refund investors’ money and pay fines, rather than attempt to reach a legal compliance. According to Yahoo …
United States / Oct. 12, 2018
Bank of Thailand Allows Banks to Open Subsidiaries for Crypto Dealings
The Bank of Thailand (BoT) has recently allowed local banks to set up subsidiaries for dealing with cryptocurrencies, local Thai source Blognone reported August 3. According to a regulatory announcement published by the BoT on August 1, Thai banks can now issue digital tokens, provide crypto brokerage services, run crypto-related businesses, and invest in cryptocurrencies through subsidiaries. However, the recent announcement has reaffirmed that all banks and other financial institutions are still banned from direct dealing with cryptocurrencies. While banks are now allowed to establish crypto-dealing branches, those branches are prohibited from offering crypto-related services to its customers and the …
Bitcoin Regulation / Aug. 4, 2018
South Carolina State Regulators Withdraw Enforcement Actions on Two Blockchain Startups
The Securities Division of the Office of the Attorney General of South Carolina has removed cease-and-desist orders against two blockchain startups, according to public documents published July 26. Today’s order removed a cease-and-desist order filed by the South Carolina Attorney General's office against shipping platform ShipChain for violating the state’s securities statutes on May 21. Regulators initially accused the firm of running afoul of securities laws during their private SHIP token sale. The second firm, cloud mining platform Genesis Mining, which was previously halted by the South Carolina Attorney General's Office Securities Division due to selling “unlicensed securities,” is now …
Blockchain / July 27, 2018
UK Financial Regulator Advises Banks on How to Manage Risks of ‘Crypto Assets’
The UK’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has issued guidance for banks on how to handle the risks associated with “crypto assets”, according to a letter posted on the FCA’s website June 11. Per the statement issued by Executive Directors of Supervision Jonathan Davidson and Megan Butler, banks should apply a highly individual approach to clients dealing with crypto assets since “the risk associated with different business relationships in a single broad category can vary.” The statement continues: “Following a risk-based approach does not mean banks should approach all clients operating in these activities in the same way. Instead, we expect …
Bitcoin Regulation / June 12, 2018
Colorado Cracks Down On Two Companies For Illegal ICO Promotion
The Colorado Department of Regulatory Agencies (DORA) announced its investigation of two companies for promoting unlawful Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs) to Colorado residents, the Denver Post reported May 3. The Colorado Securities Commissioner said that California-based Linda Healthcare Corp. and Washington-based Broad Investments LLC could potentially be violating Colorado securities law by promoting ICOs. DORA discovered that Linda Healthcare is promoting a “LindaHealthCoin” token on its website, which ostensibly can be used to purchase Linda Healthcare’s insurance. According to the website, the token can buy telemedical coverage “through an artificial intelligence chat service that creates medical solutions through use of …
Bitcoin Regulation / May 4, 2018