New OECD report takes lessons from crypto winter, faults ‘financial engineering’

Published at: Dec. 14, 2022

The Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) analyzed the crypto winter in a new policy paper titled “Lessons from the crypto winter: DeFi versus CeFi” released Dec. 14. The authors examined the impact of the crypto winter on retail investors and the role of “financial engineering” in the industry’s current problems and found a lot not to like.

The paper from the OECD, an intergovernmental body with 38 member states dedicated to economic progress and world trade, concentrated on events in the first three quarter of 2022, and placed the blame for them squarely on a lack of safeguard due to “non-compliant provision of regulated financial activity” and the fact that “some of these activities may fall outside of the existing regulatory frameworks in some jurisdictions.”

The report noted that institutional market participants exited their positions sooner than retail investors, who may have even continued to invest as the market collapsed. Investors in TerraUSD (UST), for example, had “little understanding of the circular and reflexive character of the so-called stablecoin, which had no tangible value.” Meanwhile, contagion spread through the industry due to its high interconnectivity.

The crypto winter also “exposed new forms of financial engineering” that had a negative effect on the market. According to the report:

“Developments such as liquid staking, creating derivatives backed by illiquid locked assets, create extreme liquidity transformation risk and maturity mismatches. Consecutive rounds of re-hypothecation of crypto-assets that are considered by platform clients to be lent and/or ‘locked’ as collateral create risks related to high leverage and liquidity mismatches in crypto-asset markets.”

Many of those practices derive from the “composability” of DeFi, that is, the ability to combine smart contracts to create new products, and the practices continue unabated, the report said.

1/Excellent new research by the OECD on the role of #CeFi and #DeFi in the crypto turmoil. #Crypto advocates may try to fault centralized players, but do not overlook the role of DeFi. Smart contract flaws + leveraged trading fueled volatility. https://t.co/EVCRhp3y0a pic.twitter.com/lWA2PeUclw

— Brian Laverdure, AAP (@brian_laverdure) December 14, 2022

The authors wade into the CeFi/DeFi divide within crypto, noting that DeFi worked “without issues” in the first half of the year, although DeFi’s automated liquidations could lead to greater market volatility. Both types of platform may lack regulation or regulatory compliance, and CeFi and DeFi are highly interconnected in a concentrated ecosystem.

Related: OECD releases framework to combat international tax evasion using digital assets

More faults were found in DeFi. The report documents an oracle failure during the Terra ecosystem collapsethat created opportunities for abuse on some exchanges. Differences in information access led to DeFi and CeFi platforms behaving markedly different during that crisis. The report noted:

“CeFi and DeFi markets work better in bull markets.”

The report stressed the need for educated retail investors. “When appropriate disclosure about risks is not provided by market participants, policy makers could provide warnings to investors, and in particular to retail investors, about the increased risks of such activities,” it said. It added that crypto market crises will have greater potential to spill over into tradition markets as the industry develops, and international coordination would be necessary “to avoid regulatory arbitrage opportunities currently exploited by some non-compliant crypto-asset firms.”

Tags
Related Posts
Inching closer to global agreement on taxing the sustainable digital economy
In her monthly Expert Take column, Selva Ozelli, an international tax attorney and CPA, covers the intersection between emerging technologies and sustainability, and provides the latest developments around taxes, AML/CFT regulations and legal issues affecting crypto and blockchain. Since 2013, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, or OECD, has been discussing the base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS) risks of large multinational enterprises (MNEs) — risks arising from the digitalization of the global economy. BEPS 2.0 reports came out in 2018 and 2019, aiming to ensure a fairer distribution of the rights to tax the profits of large MNEs, …
Technology / Aug. 17, 2021
OECD calls out countries for their inconsistent rules on crypto taxation
A study of cryptocurrency taxation regimes from around the world by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, or OECD, found that global crypto taxation laws are highly inconsistent. Source: OECD Report. The way crypto assets are defined vary greatly by jurisdiction. Cryptocurrency is most commonly defined as a “financial instrument or asset”, followed by a “commodity or virtual commodity." In the U.S., the asset class remains mostly undefined for tax purposes. Source: OECD Report. The same inconsistency is observed when it comes to determining the first taxable event for mined cryptocurrency assets. The most common approach here is to …
Regulation / Oct. 14, 2020
Sun Sets on Offshore Banking as Assets Worth $11 Trillion Uncovered
The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, or OECD, reported on Tuesday how automatic reporting in 2019 helped uncover $11 trillion worth of assets in offshore accounts. The result came as the Common Reporting Standard, or CRS, entered its third year of operation since its launch in 2017. Unlike many previous iterations of international tax reporting standards, the CRS requires countries to automatically report activity in accounts held by foreign nationals to their respective country of origin. This solves issues deriving from request-based information sharing, which required active suspicion and investigation from the originating country. This is supported by over …
Regulation / July 2, 2020
OECD tax director says international crypto tax standards are coming in 2021
Pascal Saint-Amans, the director of the OECD’s Centre for Tax Policy and Administration, has asserted that the 37-nation organization will introduce a common reporting standard, or CRS, for crypto assets in 2021. According to Law360, Amans stated that the crypto tax standard “would be roughly equivalent to the CRS” developed by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development to combat tax evasion. The director attributed the likely development of the crypto tax CRS to a desire to introduce stronger standards surrounding crypto regulations among its member-countries: “The timeline to deliver is probably ’21, sometime in ’21, because there is an …
Regulation / Nov. 27, 2020
OECD opens proposal on tax transparency framework for crypto to public comment
The Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, or OECD, has suggested additional requirements on reporting crypto transactions and identifying users aimed at increasing transparency for global tax authorities. In a public consultation document released on Tuesday, the OECD opened for public comment a proposal that would require crypto service providers to better identify users and report on certain transactions. The organization said that under current reporting requirements, tax authorities do not have “adequate visibility” for transactions dealing with crypto assets. According to the OECD, the crypto market posed a “significant risk” around tax transparency, claiming that any gains will eventually …
Regulation / March 22, 2022