No, Blockchain Technology Cannot Solve Everything

Published at: June 9, 2020

The crypto community was rightly aghast at the “Bitcoin Will Save Us” poster donned by a protester against racial injustice in Dallas last week.

Christ pic.twitter.com/BmRmlZnMWa

— Jessica Huseman (@JessicaHuseman) June 1, 2020

It was a tasteless and inappropriate — albeit well-meaning — attempt to impose a crypto narrative onto a decidedly non-crypto, and much larger, story.

The crypto community’s heart is in the right place

The United States protests against racial discrimination that erupted after George Floyd’s tragic killing at the hands of police have also garnered broad support from the crypto community, both on Twitter and likely also on the streets.

And so it should. The industry that has grown up around cryptocurrency has roots in anti-establishment politics, civil liberties and economic justice. It is also a diverse ecosystem of actors: developers, scientists, academics, businesspeople and journalists from around the globe. Crypto has the potential to be a truly multiracial, diverse and multidisciplinary endeavor.

But more importantly, many crypto leaders have expressed support for the ideals behind the “Black Lives Matter” movement because oppression of, and violence toward, one group among us is, or should be, an affront to us all. It echoes the famous words that Martin Niemoeller penned after the Holocaust: "First they came for the Communists and I did not speak out...”

Blockchain technology brings a great deal of promise for the marginalized, the un- and underbanked, and those who have suffered at the hands of institutionalized discrimination, especially in the finance sector.

But just as now is not the time to declare Bitcoin the savior to the situation in which we find ourselves, it is also not the time to claim that blockchain technology is a panacea to all of society’s ills.

No, blockchain is not the answer to racial injustice

Blockchain technology has a range of use cases. Some of those are already being implemented. Others are still not fully developed. From financial technology to supply chains, provenance, elections and identity management, distributed ledger technology is a truly disruptive innovation that can drive efficiencies in a number of areas of our lives.

But it cannot reverse centuries of social injustice, it cannot change human attitudes and it cannot resolve all conflicts. It can help humanity do many of these things. But the will to draft change must be of human origin.

Not only is it not the time to proclaim blockchain as the solution to the systemic racism that led to protests and riots in the U.S., but it is also not the time to be trying to squeeze a blockchain narrative into an issue that goes to the heart of humanity itself.

Imposing blockchain-based solutions, for example, on the records of violent incidents that ex-Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin had been involved in during his career would not have prevented him from killing Floyd. Chauvin’s history was well established and well documented.

The DLT future looks bright, but now is not the time and place to advocate for it

The blockchain movement has yet to fully mature. No doubt it will be at our side as we struggle to right past wrongs and recreate a more just and equitable, and hopefully less violent, world.

As we progress toward the future that blockchain technology can help us create, open finance and sovereignty over our own identities will generate benefits for those whom legacy systems and institutions have failed.

But while blockchain may be a much-needed change agent, the real drivers of change will be society itself. Policymakers may be forced to reckon with the consequences that the immutability properties of a distributed ledger will bring to bear. But they will not listen to a decentralized ledger. They will only listen to their human constituents.

Blockchain can record incidents of police brutality. It cannot prevent them.

Blockchain can record your vote. It cannot vote for you.

And the Floyd family deserves more than a “software is eating the world” response to the horrendous killing that sparked the protests. After all, we are all oracles of the annals of humankind.

All of us in the blockchain community are proponents of the potential for DLT to solve many problems our economies and societies face. But blockchain cannot solve everything. It certainly cannot save us from ourselves.

Only we can do that.

The views, thoughts and opinions expressed here are the author’s alone and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions of Cointelegraph.

Paul de Havilland is a fan of disruptive technology and an active investor in startups. He has experience covering both traditional and emerging asset classes and also pens columns on politics and the development sector. His passions include violin and opera.

Tags
Related Posts
Future of finance: US banks partner with crypto custodians
Grayscale Investments’ latest report “Reimagining the Future of Finance” defines the digital economy as “the intersection of technology and finance that’s increasingly defined by digital spaces, experiences, and transactions.” With this in mind, it shouldn’t come as a surprise that many financial institutions have begun to offer services that allow clients access to Bitcoin (BTC) and other digital assets. Last year, in particular, saw an influx of financial institutions incorporating support for crypto-asset custody. For example, Bank of New York Mellon, or BNY Mellon, announced in February 2021 plans to hold, transfer and issue Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies as an …
Decentralization / Feb. 20, 2022
‘Black Swans’ for Fiat Will Only Be a Favor for Cryptocurrencies
In the past three decades, the world has been witness to three extraordinary “black swan” events that served as structural crossroads for both societies and economies: the 9/11 terror attacks, the 2008 global financial crisis, and the COVID-19 pandemic. Nearly two decades ago, 9/11 unleashed brazen new escalations of state powers over individuals and monetary controls, all in the name of security from terrorism led by the United States and still reverberating around the globe. The 2008 economic meltdown caused by the U.S. housing crisis illuminated the fundamental economic inequality issues that fomented movements like “We Are the 99%” and …
Decentralization / May 30, 2020
The Need for a New Reserve Currency Is More Prevalent Than Ever Before
The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has brought into focus the need for international cooperation and support. Coupled with a crumbling economy, it’s shown us that now is the time for a modern, accessible reserve currency. However, markets don’t exist in a vacuum of supply and demand — there are reasons why the United States dollar is the world’s reserve currency. To understand the structural value of an economy and different markets, you first must understand how different types of production operate in times of crisis. Reserve currencies: The crisis safe havens In a world crisis like COVID-19, countries would rather hold …
Decentralization / April 27, 2020
Rapper Akon Says Bitcoin Better Than ‘Military-Backed’ US Dollar
Grammy award-winning music artist Akon has rebuffed Bitcoin (BTC) naysayers who claim that the asset lacks intrinsic value. In a radio interview published on Sept. 10, Akon lambasted the perception that fiat currencies are any less vulnerable to this same critique, arguing that: “Nothing backs the dollar. The U.S. doesn’t have natural resources that back the dollar. What they do have is the military.” People give cryptocurrency value, not governments Akon — who has twelve Billboard Top Ten Hits to his name, including the popular single “Smack That” — spoke out during the interview in favor of decentralization and trustless …
Decentralization / Sept. 10, 2019
SkyBridge Capital’s Anthony Scaramucci expects a pro-crypto presidential candidacy
Anthony Scaramucci, the founder of the hedge fund SkyBridge Capital, thinks that the next United States presidential candidate will likely be pro-cryptocurrency, given that the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) recently announced the approval of a fourth Bitcoin (BTC) futures exchange-traded fund (ETF). During an interview at SALT’s Crypto Bahamas conference, Scaramucci told Cointelegraph that he has been bullish on a pro-crypto presidential candidate since the SEC approved Bitcoin futures under the Securities Act of 1933 (‘33 Act) and the Securities Act of 1934 ('34 Act). He added: “The Congress is indicating that they are more crypto-friendly. You now …
Decentralization / May 5, 2022