Russian Parliament working group: There should be 'mechanisms to control crypto transactions'

Published at: March 10, 2022

Amid the ongoing discussion between the Central Bank of Russia (CBR) and the nation’s Finance Ministry on the future of crypto, a State Duma (the lower chamber of Parliament) working group has voiced their support for regulating rather than banning digital assets.

The working group called for the “clear regulation of the digital assets industry” as the most effective approach to lower the risks associated with crypto’s adoption in the country.

As reported by local media, some 50 experts took part in the panel session called by the Duma’s working group “On the questions of the regulation of cryptocurrency”. The participants came to the conclusion that the “effective and transparent” regulation of the digital asset industry in Russia demands the mechanisms “to control the cryptocurrency transactions”. Such mechanisms already operate in other countries, as experts mentioned, though there is no public information as to what jurisdictions they referred to.

The key takeaway from the session is the group's apparent support of the Finance Ministry’s approach to regulation, with some technical reservations. Experts urged the Ministry to augment the language in its bill related to non-institutional mining, the role of traditional banks, know your customer (KYC) procedures and illicit uses of crypto.

Should it attune to its own working group’s advice, the lower chamber will be putting its weight behind the position of the Finance Ministry in the heated up debate with the CBR, which promotes a restrictive approach to crypto.

This battle came into a decisive phase in 2022. On Jan. 20, the CBR announced a proposal for a ban on mining and the circulation of private digital currencies in the country. The Finance Ministry responded quickly by presenting its own “Framework for regulating the mechanisms of digital currencies circulation”, which defined digital assets as being similar to fiat currencies in many regards.

On Feb. 18, both bodies came up with their own contradictory bills. The CBR doubled down on its intention to ban the issuance and circulation of crypto, while the Ministry proposed to define legal requirements to exchange platforms enabling their operation under special registration procedures.

With early signs of parliamentary support and a new regulatory roadmap proposed by deputy prime minister Dmitriy Chernyshenko, the Central Bank's position in the crypto dispute seems increasingly precarious. The regulator's blanket ban proposal dramatically lacks any institutional allies within both executive and legislative branches of the government.

Tags
Regulation
Bitcoin Regulation
Cryptocurrencies
Government
Law
Russia
Sanctions
Bank Of Russia
Finance
Related Posts
Law Decoded: Russia flounders, America competes, IMF keeps fuming, Jan. 24–31
One of the most fascinating implications of the collision between traditional political institutions and the crypto space is how it can reveal the glaring lack of cohesion within power systems that otherwise look monolithic. Digital assets reside in a parallel policy dimension where neither a centralized consensus nor a clear rulebook exists, leading to a surprising variety of voices and opinions emerging in the absence of a politically coordinated course. Last week, a rare lively policy debate broke out in Russia in the aftermath of its central bank’s attempt to promote a hardline stance on crypto. One does not often …
Regulation / Jan. 31, 2022
Russia’s Finance Ministry introduces digital currency bill, brushes off Central Bank’s objections
Russia’s Ministry of Finance has upped the stakes in its drawn-out showdown against the country’s Central Bank by formally introducing a bill that proposes to regulate digital assets rather than banning them. On Feb. 21, the Ministry introduced a draft of the federal law “On digital currency” to the government. This stage of the legislative process precedes the bill’s introduction to the parliament for consideration. The agency cited the “formation of a legal marketplace for digital currencies, along with determining rules for their circulation and range of participants” as the rationale for the initiative. Emphasizing that the bill does not …
Regulation / Feb. 21, 2022
Law Decoded: Crypto in times of war, Feb. 28–Mar. 7
A war rages on Europe’s eastern rim, having already left thousands of people dead and injured and millions more displaced. Digital assets have become so woven into the global financial system that a major political and economic crisis like the one unfolding right now has crypto inevitably involved on all levels: individual, institutional and national. From Russian nationals turning their burning passports into nonfungible tokens (NFTs) to refugees using crypto as a last financial resort, millions of dollars worth of crypto donations flowing to Ukraine, and both digital asset platforms and the United States government weighing crypto sanctions against Russia, …
Regulation / March 7, 2022
Russia to include crypto into its tax code: Here is what the rules might look like
In the last few months, the standoff between the Central Bank of Russia (CBR) and the country’s Ministry of Finance over crypto regulation has become the key regulatory plot for the Russian crypto community to follow. Simultaneously, however, another important legislative development has been unfolding somewhat under the radar: negotiations around tax code amendments that would make cryptocurrencies a taxable asset class. Here’s how it went down so far. 13% for individuals and 20% for companies As the head of the State Duma’s (the lower chamber of Russian Parliament) financial markets committee, Anatoly Aksakov told local media on April 7 …
Regulation / April 20, 2022
Law Decoded: Competing narratives around crypto clash on the Earth Day, April 19-26
Regulation by enforcement, a fast and economical substitute for thorough rulemaking, is widely regarded as some of the U.S. executive agencies’ preeminent approach to crypto regulation. It could be summed up as letting crypto firms explore the boundaries of what is permissible by themselves and then punishing industry participants in case their exploratory actions come to look like a transgression. Others will take heed and learn from the explorer’s negative experience. While it is the United States Securities and Exchange Commission that gets accused of over-reliance on regulation by enforcement most frequently, other federal agencies do that as well. Last …
Regulation / April 25, 2022