Gavin Andresen’s ‘Fractional-Reserve Mining’: Cloud Miners Respond

Published at: Aug. 22, 2014

Last Thursday, Kyle Torpey at CryptoCoinsNews reported on a quote from Bitcoin developer Gavin Andresen that went largely unnoticed.

In response to a Reddit post asking whether cloud mining contracts make sense, Andresen wrote the following: “No, they make no sense. I suspect many of them will turn out to be Ponzi schemes.”

Then on Monday, six days later, Andresen posted the following on a Bitcointalk.org forum post about GAWMiners:

“I don't know nuthin about ‘cloud mining’ — so I've got a dumb question.

“How do you know that when you send money to a cloud mining place they are actually dedicating hardware to hashing for you? What stops them from practicing ‘fractional reserve mining’ — reselling the same hardware to eleven different people, and using the money coming in to pay Fantabulous Weekly Returns With Profitability Guaranteed?”

These are important questions for consumers, especially as they come down to a question of trust, which, as Torpey wrote, Bitcoin was designed to make obsolete.

“[C]ompanies who continue to force their customers to trust them will find it difficult to succeed in this highly competitive market,” he wrote in last Thursday’s CCN post.

Therefore, we reached out to a couple of cloud mining company owners whom Cointelegraph has interviewed before to get their thoughts on how their businesses can overcome this trust gap.

Cloud Mining Companies Respond

“Gavin Andresen made some good points,” Jeremy Biggs of PB Mining said Tuesday night. “However, those points extend to every corner of the world of Bitcoin — a world where consumer protection is very hard to come by. We will continue to allow time itself to run its course of proving our trustworthiness in this market.”

In response to Andresen’s original “Ponzi scheme” comment from last week, Marco Streng from Genesis Mining invited him to Iceland to tour the company’s mining facilities.

Streng also reached out to us to share a couple of photos of the company’s third mining farm. That’s Jakov Dolic, the company’s head of sales, in the second photo.

-Genesis mining farm

- Jakov Dolic, Head of Sales

We then asked Streng to verify how his company does not practice “fractional reserve mining” and how consumers can verify this. Streng replied to Cointelegraph via email:

“Practicing fractional reserve mining is at best a bet against your client (and at worst, a Ponzi scheme if you never intend to pay). In any way such an operation is a scam, because it does not hold its promise that mining really takes place. If such a company bets against its client it can (i) win the bet and earn a higher profit than an honest business (ii) lose the bet (and probably get insolvent). If you are anonymous then there is only an upside (and no downside).

There is no way for any mining company to prove that they really own the hardware.

At Genesis Mining we do our best to be as transparent as possible: we publish information about the company founders on our webpage, have a registered company and frequently appear at conferences all over the world. Furthermore, we publish pictures of our mining operation, to prove that we own huge amounts of hardware. And we invited Gavin to have a look at our mining farm (and drink a Bavarian beer with us – Gavin, it is delicious stuff!).”

All of this more or less confirms Andresen's initial thoughts: Some companies will prove to be Ponzi schemes, and some will prove to be legit. Proof is only a question of time, as there are incentives to be unscrupulous and incentives not to be. The difference is only one of those is a long-term strategy.

Did you enjoy this article? You may also be interested in reading these ones:

Interview with Marco Streng, CEO of Genesis MiningCloudmining Part 1: A market overview for usersHow the ”Impossible” Became the Future: A Talk with Genesis Mining’s Marco Streng

Coin HR - the best way to find a perfect bitcoin job or an applicant for your vacancy. We connect talent with opportunity!

Tags
Related Posts
Bitcoin Block Size, Explained
Why did Bitcoin fork and split? The inability of the community to find consensus regarding a proposal to increase the block size resulted in a user-activated hard fork of the Bitcoin blockchain in August 2017. While numerous proposals advocating a change to the block size limit had failed to gather the support required to manifest change, transaction fees had skyrocketed by mid-2017. During August 2015, the average BTC transaction fee was just $0.50. However, by June 2017, median fees had increased 10x to approximate $5. With nearly half of the world’s population living on less than $5.50 per day, high …
Blockchain / July 24, 2019
Cloudmining: The Bane or Blessing of Bitcoin? (Op-Ed)
With the promise of the moon for its users without the need to purchase expensive mining equipment, the cloudmining industry has been experiencing its ups, and recently, its downs. While the ostensible scams and pyramid schemes in the cryptocurrency space are damaging and ultimately bad for Bitcoin, the concept of mining “in the cloud” can be beneficial to the long-term growth of the ecosystem. What is Cloudmining? Put simply, cloudmining is when you buy processing power that is generated at remote data centers. Many users have opted to mine “remotely” in this way since it offers no additional electricity costs, …
Bitcoin / April 7, 2015
Gavin Andresen, Bitcoin Redeemer (Op-Ed)
In a November 6 interview in Dublin, Ireland, recorded at this year’s Web Summit, Gavin Andresen called Bitcoin “shady.” He was speaking of Bitcoin in the past, and said, “We’re quickly evolving to something that is much more mainstream, much more accepted, much easier to use.” Speaking with the Wall Street Journal’s Lisa Fleisher, he talked about the future — of Bitcoin, mining, money, regulation and the world. “The biggest misconception is still that Bitcoin is some deep, dark, mysterious thing for illicit markets. . . . We’ve evolved past that and we see huge companies like Dell Computer accepting …
Bitcoin / Nov. 15, 2014
Bitcoin and Ethereum transaction fees sink 95% from all-time highs
The cost of using the Bitcoin and Ethereum blockchains is on the rapid decline, as evidenced by a 93%–95% reduction in average transaction fees over the past couple of months. Fees are paid to the miners who process transactions on a typical proof-of-work blockchain. The size of the fee depends on the size of the transaction in bytes and how many transactions a coin has gone through in the past (as these need to be checked every time a coin is moved). Supply and demand for space also dictate the size of a transaction fee since blockchains have limited capacity. …
Blockchain / June 9, 2021
Blockchain company Borderless Services Inc.: Forbes should be ‘under US ownership’
Blockchain holding group Borderless Services Inc. made headlines in late April amid reports that it had placed a $700 million bid to acquire business news publisher Forbes Media LLC. In an interview with Cointelegraph, CEO Patrick McConlogue shed light on the acquisition target and why it aligns with the organization’s overall vision. “Acquiring any company is a long process, and there are a lot of moving parts,” McConlogue wrote in an email, adding: “We are excited to participate either as owners, partners, or combined force with the other bidders. Collectively we all want Forbes back under US ownership and are …
Bitcoin / June 1, 2021