Voyager ordered by New Jersey to 'cease and desist’

Published at: March 30, 2022

The New Jersey Bureau of Securities has issued a cease and desist order against Voyager Digital for selling unregistered securities through its Voyager Earn program.

Voyager Digital (VGX) is a centralized, crypto-based staking, trading, and lending platform.

The order claims that each of the crypto staking and lending accounts issued through the program since 2019 are unregistered securities because of their promise of interest rates as high as 12%.

The Bureau cites as evidence for the claim messages on Voyager’s homepage encouraging users to “grow your portfolio” and “journey to the new frontier of investing.”

New Jersey claims that about 52,800 accounts and $187 million in assets are from users based in the state, out of roughly 1.5 million active accounts and $5 billion in assets on Voyager in total.

Voyager’s marketing tactics were also criticized, with the regulators stating promotions for the program failed to disclose that Voyager’s parent company Voyager Digital LLC is a publicly traded company in Canada, not the U.S. The order claims that this “creates a misleading impression with respect to Voyager Digital, LLC's regulatory status.”

The Bureau also alleges that while Voyager claimed to be licensed, it was only licensed in some states to act as a “money services business,” which the Bureau states does not allow for the sale of unregistered securities. It added the claim “may convey the misleading impression to unsophisticated investors that Voyager is "licensed" to offer and sell such securities.”

At least five other states, Alabama, Oklahoma, Texas, Kentucky, and Vermont, have slapped Voyager with various orders, or demanded the company explain how it is not issuing unregistered securities if it wishes to stay in business in their respective states.

This incident is one in a growing list of such cases or orders against crypto companies that offer interest-bearing accounts to users. In February, crypto lending platform BlockFi was hit with a similar cease and desist order from Washington state and a $100 million penalty for selling unregistered securities in the form of its interest-bearing accounts.

Related: Class action suit against Coinbase alleges unregulated securities sales

Last September, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) threatened to sue crypto exchange Coinbase if it launched its long-awaited Coinbase Lend program. This program would have resembled Blockfi and Voyager’s interest-bearing accounts for crypto lenders. At the time, Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong called the SEC’s behavior “really sketchy,” as the threat came without any legal overtures.

Tags
Sec
Related Posts
The responsibility behind a crypto lender’s asset listing
Crypto lenders are the institutions situated between consumers and the untamed, blockchain-based, and often unregulated space of cryptocurrencies. As such, they are in a peculiar position when it comes to responsibility towards their customers and the assets for which they provide services. Consequently, when choosing which currencies to support, lenders lead a delicate dance of responsibility, a balancing act between catering to popular demand and adding cryptocurrencies that are sustainable, worthwhile and safe. Demand vs. approval: The question of endorsement It’s unsurprising that in a nascent industry full of new investors, a lender’s asset integration is often taken for endorsement. …
Blockchain / Oct. 16, 2021
Texas and New Jersey regulators go after Celsius Network
The Texas State Securities Board has filed for a hearing with the potential to impose a cease and desist order against crypto lending firm Celsius Network for not offering securities licensed at the state or federal level, while the New Jersey Bureau of Securities has ordered the platform to stop offering and selling interest-earning cryptocurrency products. According to a Sept. 17 filing, the Texas regulator will be holding a hearing related to allegations that Celsius Network is offering and selling securities in Texas that are not registered or permitted in addition to not registering as a dealer under the state’s …
Regulation / Sept. 17, 2021
Happy to be regulated? Fallout from BlockFi settlement is a matter of speculation
It might seem unlikely that BlockFi founder and CEO Zac Prince would describe a prosecution that resulted in a $100-million fine for his company as “a win not only for BlockFi but for the broader cryptocurrency industry,” but that is indeed what he said. And, he might be right, although it remains to be seen for now. The settlement Founded in 2017, BlockFi is a New Jersey-based crypto financial institution with a team of 850 and one million clients worldwide. Its popular BlockFi Interest Account product, with half a million users, including 407,000 in the United States, was the object …
Regulation / Feb. 21, 2022
Nexo agrees to $45M settlement with SEC and NASAA over earn product
Crypto lender Nexo Capital has agreed to pay $45 million in penalties to the United States Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) and The North American Securities Administrators Association (NASAA) for allegedly failing to register the offer and sale of its Earn Interest Product (EIP). The news was announced by the SEC and NASAA in two separate statements on Jan. 19. According to a statement from the SEC, Nexo agreed to pay a $22.5 million penalty and cease its unregistered offer and sale of the EIP to U.S. investors. The additional $22.5 million will be paid in fines to settle similar charges …
Blockchain / Jan. 19, 2023
BlockFi execs, Gemini named in proposed lawsuit by a disgruntled investor
An investor with nearly $2 million worth of funds frozen in bankrupt cryptocurrency lender BlockFi has filed a class action complaint against its founders, two directors and crypto exchange Gemini. In a Feb. 28 complaint filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, investor Trey Greene accused the defendants of numerous wrongdoings, including violating the consumer fraud and exchange acts, breaching its fiduciary duties, as well as offering and selling unregistered securities. “The unregistered securities sold by the BFI [BlockFi] Defendants on behalf of BlockFi were marketed and sold via a steady stream of misrepresentations and …
Regulation / March 2, 2023