US SEC Adds Fraud to List of Charges Against ‘Crypto’ Firm Longfin

Published at: June 5, 2019

The United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has filed fraud charges against supposed cryptocurrency firm Longfin Corp. and its CEO Venkata S. Meenavalli, according to a press release on June 5.

Longfin saw a massive jump in its share price in 2017 when it claimed that it had redirected its business model toward blockchain technology.

The associate director of the Division of Enforcement, Anita B. Bandy, summarized the allegations as such:

“In our complaint against Longfin and Meenavalli and our amended complaint against Altahawi, we allege a multi-pronged fraud involving fake revenue, misrepresentations to the SEC, and false statements to Nasdaq.”

The SEC filed its complaint in the federal district court of Manhattan, New York claiming that Longfin fabricated 90% of its revenue and sold over 400,000 shares of Longfin, that it did not have the funds to back, in a scheme to secure its spot on the Nasdaq.

The complaint also reportedly states that the SEC granted Longfin’s Regulation A+ offering based on the supposition that the company was principally managed and run out of the U.S., when in actuality the company’s operations, assets and management were all offshore.

Consultant Andy Altahawi stands accused in the SEC complaint of reporting the fraudulent number of qualifying shareholders and shares sold in Longfin’s public offering to Nasdaq. The U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of New Jersey also announced on June 5 that it is pursuing criminal charges against CEO Meenavalli.

As previously reported by Cointelegraph, the SEC previously charged Longfin and CEO Meenavalli with securities fraud and froze over $27 million in Longfin trading profits in April 2018.

The SEC then accused Meenavalli of insider trading in the amount of more than two million unregistered, restricted shares to consultant Amro Altahawi, as well as five-figure quantities of restricted shares to individuals Dorababu Penumarthi and Suresh Tammineedi.

The commission alleged that the defendants had fraudulently boosted their stock price by releasing a misleading statement about acquiring an alleged crypto business, and quickly sold their shares at the pumped-up price. The SEC reportedly pursued penalties including disgorgement via Section 5 of the Securities Act of 1933, pertaining to ill-gotten profits.

Tags
Sec
Related Posts
Abramoff-linked crypto firm says SEC has no case against it
The NAC Foundation has accused the United States Securities and Exchange Commission of misconduct in an ongoing case. According to court documents Oct. 20, Rowland Marcus Andrade and his company NAC Foundation asked a San Francisco federal judge to dismiss the SEC’s June lawsuit alleging that he and his associate Jack Abramoff defrauded investors in a $5.6 million token offering. Andrade argued that the SEC “purposefully attempted to mislead the court” by accusing him of offering a technology that had never been developed. According to the defendant, the SEC was aware that he held patents for Anti-Money Laundering technology related …
Regulation / Oct. 21, 2020
Digital Chamber of Commerce Weighs In on Telegram Legal Battle With SEC
The Chamber of Digital Commerce has filed an amicus brief in the ongoing court case between encrypted messenger service Telegram and the United States Securities Exchange Commission (SEC). Filed on Jan. 21, the document was authored by Lilya Tessler, a partner and the New York head of Sidley Austin LLP, counsel to the Chamber. In the amicus brief — a legal document that allows a non-litigant to submit its expertise or opinion in a case — the Chamber makes a number of arguments regarding how the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York should consider digital assets. …
Blockchain / Jan. 21, 2020
Launch of Binance US Can Have Far-Reaching Effects on Crypto Market
From the outside looking in, the United States seems to present a host of amazing financial opportunities. However, when it comes to launching cryptocurrency exchanges or altcoin trading platforms, these possibilities start to dwindle and fade quite rapidly. In this regard, over the past few years, the U.S. regulatory landscape has seemed so hostile toward the crypto industry that a number of prominent exchange operators have preferred not to serve U.S. citizens at all — a case in point being Bancor, a decentralized liquidity network, that recently decided to block American citizens from using its website to convert its tokens. …
Blockchain / Sept. 30, 2019
US Department of Justice Accuses Crypto Exec of $7 Million Fraud Scheme
Federal authorities in the state of New York have unsealed fraud charges against the principal of a purported cryptocurrency escrow company Volantis in the amount of over $7 million. According to an announcement by the Department of Justice (DoJ), the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York and the Assistant Director-in-Charge of the New York Field Office of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) unsealed a filing with the allegations on July 25. The defendant, Volantis principal Jon Barry Thompson, was also arrested on the same day. Thompson allegedly made false representations about Volantis’ purported Bitcoin transaction …
Blockchain / July 25, 2019
Crypto Firm Accused of Fraud, Duping Investor Into Buying $2 Million in Tokens
A lawsuit recently filed in a United States district court in New York claims that an investor was misled into investing $2 million dollars in the cryptocurrency MCash, a Feb. 1 court filing states. The filing alleges that the plaintiff Lijun Sun transferred $2 million to New-York based investment group Blue Ocean Capital Group, Inc. to purchase MCash tokens, stating: “Not only was the MCash Token not properly registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), but more importantly, in connection with selling the MCash Token, Defendants made numerous misrepresentations and omissions that induced Plaintiff to invest $2 million.” …
Bitcoin / Feb. 6, 2019