Iowa regulator orders BlockFi to pay $943K over alleged unregistered securities offering

Published at: June 14, 2022

The Iowa Insurance Division, or IID, a regulator responsible for many securities sales in the state, has fined crypto lending firm BlockFi more than $943,000 after it allegedly offered and sold unregistered securities.

In a Tuesday announcement, the state regulator said BlockFi had “offered and sold securities in Iowa that were not registered or permitted for sale in Iowa” in addition to not being registered as a broker-dealer or agent, in violation of the state’s Securities Act. The IID ordered BlockFi to pay $943,396.22 as an administrative fine as well as to cease and desist “from making any untrue statement of material facts regarding securities.”

“While innovations, like cryptocurrencies, may provide for growth and evolution in the financial system, it is important that regulators ensure this occurs within an appropriate framework that protects investors while still facilitating responsible capital formation,” said Iowa Insurance Commissioner Doug Ommen.

BlockFi Ordered to Pay More Than $943,000 in Iowa for Failing to Register Securitieshttps://t.co/LJIYMWX6U1

— Iowa Insurance Div (@IowaInsDiv) June 14, 2022

The order behind the financial penalty was part of an investigation by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, in which BlockFi was ordered in February to pay $50 million in settlement to the federal agency as well as $50 million to 32 state-level regulators. According to the IID, BlockFi allegedly made “misrepresentations and omissions about the level of risk in its loan portfolio” and claimed its institutional loans were "typically" over-collateralized when the statement was only true for 17% of loans made by the platform in the first half of 2021.

“BlockFi's statements that their loans were "typically" over-collateralized suggested to investors that they had secured more protection from default than BlockFi had actually secured,” said the IID.

Federal and state regulators seemed to target many crypto lending platforms in 2021, with the New York Attorney General’s office ordering two firms to “cease any and all such activity” while potentially investigating three others. Financial regulators from a number of U.S. states, including Texas, New Jersey, Alabama, Kentucky and Vermont, claimed in 2021 that BlockFi had offered securities unlicensed at the state or federal level.

Related: Happy to be regulated? Fallout from BlockFi settlement is a matter of speculation

BlockFi CEO Zac Prince announced on Monday that the firm would be laying off 20% of its staff — reducing the number of employees to just over 600 — citing the need to achieve profitability goals. It’s unclear whether the financial penalties from state regulators played a role in BlockFi’s decision, but the news came amid the crypto market experiencing extreme volatility, with the price of Bitcoin (BTC), Ether (ETH) and many others dropping between 25–40% in the last seven days.

Tags
Regulation
United States
Cryptocurrency Exchange
Law
Lending
Related Posts
SEC chair doubles down, tells crypto firms 'come in and talk to us'
Gary Gensler, chair of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, is once again urging crypto projects with securities to register with the regulatory body to ensure that investors are protected. In a prepared statement for his testimony at the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs scheduled for Sept. 14, Gensler said the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, was working with the Commodities Futures Trading Commission for investor protection in crypto markets. In addition, he hopes to develop a policy framework by working with the Federal Reserve, Department of Treasury, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, …
Regulation / Sept. 13, 2021
Crypto's impact on sanctions: Are regulators' concerns justified?
The use of cryptocurrencies to evade international sanctions from various international governmental organizations like the United Nations (UN), the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank, among others, has been a concern for regulators ever since the creation of cryptocurrencies. The rapidly increasing adoption of digital currencies in the last two years makes this discussion more important than ever, especially with the advent of central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) like the digital yuan. In an interview on Nov.17, United States Deputy Treasury Secretary Wally Adeyemo said that the efficacy of U.S. sanctions would not be undermined by central bank …
Bitcoin / Nov. 30, 2021
California regulator orders Celsius to stop selling securities in the state
The Department of Financial Protection and Innovation of California (DFPI) continues to bring actions against crypto interest account providers, failing to comply with the local law. After commanding BlockFi and Voyager to stop their offerings in the state, the DFPI issued a desist and refrain order to crypto lending firm Celsius. The order simply means that the crypto lending platform, which is undergoing the bankruptcy procedure, should stop all of its further operations on the sale and marketing of securities in the state of California. The order had been published on Aug. 8 and claims that Celsius Network and its …
Regulation / Aug. 10, 2022
Regulators have a weak case against FTX on deposit insurance
In a cease-and-desist letter to fast-growing crypto exchange FTX, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) shed light on a now-deleted tweet from the exchange’s president, Brett Harrison, and issued a stark warning over the company’s messaging. Harrison’s original tweet said, “Direct deposits from employers to FTX US are stored in individually FDIC-insured bank accounts in the users’ names.” He added, “Stocks are held in FDIC-insured and SIPC [Security Investor Protection Corporation]-insured brokerage accounts.” Although Harrison stewarded FTX to its best-ever year in 2021, increasing revenue by 1,000%, the firm now faces the unenviable prospect of running afoul of a powerful …
Regulation / Aug. 26, 2022
California State Assembly passes bill for licensing and regulating crypto firms
Lawmakers in California State Assembly 71-0 passed the Digital Financial Assets Law, also known as AB 2269, on Tuesday, Aug. 30. The bill is now in the hands of the state’s governor Gavin Newsom, who will either set it into motion or veto it completely. This bill requires digital asset exchanges and crypto companies to have an operating license given by the state of California's Department of Financial Protection and Innovation. Any operations outside of said license will be prohibited. It would come into effect on and after Jan. 1, 2025. If not followed, perpetrators could receive a civil penalty …
Regulation / Sept. 1, 2022