BitLicense 2014 vs IntLicense 1994: What if this had passed 20 years ago?

Published at: Aug. 27, 2014

“We have sought to strike an appropriate balance that helps protect consumers and root out illegal activity – without stifling beneficial innovation”

We should all be fortunate that the statement above was ‘never’ made by Ron Brown; the former chairman of the Department of Commerce, which oversees the National Telecommunications and Information Administration.

Those were the words of the Benjamin M. Lawsky on July 17, 2014 in a statement introducing the proposed BitLicense regulation.  But what if 20 years earlier on July 17, 1994 a document known as the IntLicense was released to the world for a 45 day review period by the public?

Would the majority of Americans know how to reply? How different would our world look today? Would we still have companies like Facebook, Twitter, Netflix, Google and countless other forms of technology we now take for granted. 1994 was a very critical time for the Internet as the first browser was just about to make its official press release on October 13th and people were just starting to get the feel for the AOL Instant Messenger and this radical new technology called email.

Over the last month, the comparisons keep being made of how this could have been the Internet itself that is being stifled of innovation. It’s understandable that no one want’s to read another 35 pages, but just think about all the technology that you take for granted today and you should recognize that the BitLicense is as detrimental to growth as the theoretical IntLicense described here would have been to the Internet.

By simply changing a few definitions “Virtual Currencies” to “Virtual Communication”, “Anti-Money Laundering” to “Anti-Anonymous Communication”, “Compliance” to “Copyright”, and adding one more to distinguish “Virtual Communication” from “Virtual Commerce”, we start to the get the picture of what the world might have been!

What if every Blogger had to hire a “copyright” expert and every time you wanted to post a comment on-line, your identity had to be confirmed, where would we be today? Here are a few sections of the IntLicense proposal:

Section 200.3 License 

(a)     License required. No Person shall, without a license obtained from the superintendent as provided in this Part, engage in any Virtual Currency [Communication] Business Activity. (b)     Unlicensed agents prohibited. Each Licensee is prohibited from conducting any Virtual Currency [Communication] Business Activity through an agent or agency arrangement when the agent is not a Licensee. -----------------------Section 200.15 Anti-money laundering [Anti-anonymous communication] program 

All values in United States dollars referenced herein must be calculated using the methodology to determine the value of Virtual Currency [Commerce] in Fiat [Government] Currency that was approved by the Department under this Part. (a)     Each Licensee shall conduct an initial risk assessment that will consider legal, compliance [copyright], financial, and reputational risks associated with the Licensee’s activities, services, customers, counterparties, and geographic location and shall establish, maintain, and enforce an anti-money laundering [anti-anonymous communication] program based thereon. The Licensee shall conduct additional assessments on an annual basis, or more frequently as risks change, and shall modify its anti-money laundering [anti-anonymous communication] program as appropriate to reflect any such changes. 

--------------------------

Section 200.19 Consumer protection 

(1)     virtual currency [communication] is not legal tender [speech], is not backed [endorsed] by the government, and accounts and value balances [controversial statements] are not subject to Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation [1st Amendment Protections] or Securities Investor Protection Corporation protections [4th Amendment Protections against diary and ‘private papers’ searches]; 

----------------------------

Unlike Government agencies, which create inflation but clearly do not acknowledge its existence, this document does since $10,000 today sure isn’t what it was back in 1994:

(2)     Reports on transactions. When a Licensee is involved in a transaction or series of transactions for the receipt, exchange, conversion, purchase, sale, transfer, or transmission of Virtual Currency [Communication for commerce], in an aggregate amount exceeding the United States dollar value of $10,000 [$6,218] in one day, by one Person, the Licensee shall notify the Department, in a manner prescribed by the superintendent, within 24 hours.  

It’s hard to put the genie back in the bottle as has recently been proven with the constant attempts to pass Internet control bills like PIPA, SOPA and CISPA, but we all know the Government will just keep on trying. It looks clear that this time around the mistakes of letting technology roam free are being corrected before the ball starts rolling. If the process isn’t slowed down by regulation and licensing, government agents won’t be able to form a discussion committee fast enough to keep up with the most recent wave of MIT and Harvard dropouts looking to be the next Zuckerberg or Jobs before him.

Here is the IntLicense in its entirety, hopefully it will be in the hands of all those that helped create it, and they see what they are trying to do within this new world of technological and financial freedom!

Donation Address: 1A2SReWAxEEZ5mFcvVNmqZM9zkx9cg1kWy

IntLicense 1994 (drafted from BitLicense 2014) by Tone Vays

Did you enjoy this article? You may also be interested in reading these one:

On the New York BitLicense Proposal by Circle CEO, Jeremy Allaire Bitcoin at a Crossroads - Tackling the BitLicense
Help Cointelegraph tell the World Health Organization to accept bitcoin to fight Ebola! They have no reason not to take it! 
Tags
Related Posts
Andrew Yang says he'll transform NYC into a Bitcoin hub if elected mayor
Andrew Yang, the Democratic Party front-runner in the race to be New York’s next mayor said he would transform New York City into “a hub for BTC and other cryptocurrencies” noting the city to be “the world’s financial capital.” The former presidential candidate made the comment in a tweet earlier today which drew a flurry of mixed reactions, with some proclaiming it to be a campaign-selling maneuver and others equating it to political suicide. The most unifying reaction, however, was the demand that Yang use his powers, if elected, to end the BitLicense, enacted by the New York Department of …
Adoption / Feb. 12, 2021
PwC’s Pierre-Edouard Wahl: Blockchain Can Bring Positive Competition to Swiss Banking Space
Cointelegraph recently had the chance to speak with Pierre-Edouard Wahl, the head of blockchain digital services at PwC Switzerland, about the future potential of blockchain in the country. Wahl, who noted that PwC Switzerland worked closely with main Swiss stock exchange SIX on their announcement of a future distributed ledger-based digital asset exchange, elaborated on his beliefs that crypto must be used in order to go mainstream enough to give people back control of their digital footprints. This interview has been edited and condensed. Molly Jane: Could you tell us how you got interested in the blockchain and cryptocurrency space? …
Adoption / Aug. 8, 2018
BitLicense Approval Shines Fresh Light On New York-Crypto Relationship
The recent approval of Genesis Global Trading’s BitLicense application has shone fresh light on New York State’s relationship with the cryptocurrency industry. Although New York is historically a business-friendly center and international financial hub, many industry players have criticized the regulatory requirements enforced by the New York State Department of Financial Services (DFS) through the BitLicense since its release date in 2015. Most of these criticisms were confirmed in a round table held earlier this year by New York State senators Jesse Hamilton and David Carlucci, who invited cryptocurrency companies to raise their concerns about the BitLicense. Stakeholders reiterated that …
United States / June 1, 2018
Ukraine Drafts Its Own BitLicense, As ‘Surprisingly Positive’ Dialogue Begins With Central Bank
Bitcoin regulation looks imminent in Ukraine, with the release of its own BitLicense draft. Initial reception has been described as “surprisingly positive” by the country’s Central Bank and financial sector. BitLicense: Ukraine Michael Chobanian, founder of the Kuna Bitcoin Agency and the Bitcoin Embassy in Ukraine, presented a report titled “Project for the Development of Bitcoin in Ukraine.” He submitted it at the extended session of the commission on the issue of individual payments board before the National Bank of Ukraine (NBU) held on May 27. Citing Bitcoin’s potential, as well as investor interest within the country, Chobanian proposed to …
Bitcoin Regulation / June 19, 2015
ItBit Set to Become First US Regulated Bitcoin Bank
Having filed its registration application in New York, ItBit is looking to become the first regulated Bitcoin bank in America. ItBit, a digital currency exchange operationally based in Singapore and with a head office in New York, looks to become the first officially regulated Bitcoin bank as they look to expand their service offering. The move would allow the company to legitimately take on a more traditional banking service role while meeting relevant legal requirements. According to Reuters, people privy to the matter expect that the application could be approved “in the next couple weeks.” The exchange appears ready to …
Bitcoin / April 24, 2015