Tether Claims to Be Okay With Merger of Class-Action Lawsuits Against It

Published at: Jan. 17, 2020

Currently facing multiple lawsuits, cryptocurrency stablecoin issuer Tether (USDT) received a request from prosecutors asking for consolidation, combining three lawsuits into one, which Tether has not denied.

“We did not oppose the plaintiffs’ requests to combine these frivolous claims, originally filed, respectively, in October in New York, in November in Washington and in January in New York,” reads a Tether statement shared with Cointelegraph via email on Jan. 17, 2020.

Multiple lawsuits

Various parties have suspected Tether, alongside related exchange Bitfinex, of foul play numerous times over their years in existence.

One of the most recent ordeals on the subject purports that Tether and Bitfinex allegedly caused Bitcoin’s bull run of 2017 by carrying out illegal activities.

As a result, three lawsuits against Tether surfaced, which now may be combined into a single prosecution.

Request for consolidation

Legal counsel for the lawsuits — Leibowitz, Young and Faubus — filed a letter with the presiding judge on Jan. 16 requesting a merger of the three disputes.

The letter included that the mentioned lawsuits overlap in multiple areas, sharing similarities which may allow for consolidation.

Tether’s statement to Cointelegraph noted an additional claim pending: “A fourth class action was also filed in New York yesterday, which we expect will be consolidated with the previous three actions,” the statement read, before dismissing the lot: “None of these cases present meritorious claims.”

Comments on legitimacy

Additionally, Tether claimed that the prosecutors’ research is incorrect, explaining:

“That research deploys preselected data to retrofit a desired narrative and demonstrates a patent misunderstanding of the cryptocurrency market and the demand that drives purchases of Tether.”

“Tether will continue to defend the digital token ecosystem and the many contributions of the cryptocurrency community, and will not now or in the future pay any amount to settle plaintiffs’ claims,” the statement continued. “Tether and its affiliates have never used Tether tokens or issuances to manipulate the cryptocurrency market or token pricing.”

Suspicions against Tether are long-standing, however, as the company has headlined numerous articles about its allegedly questionable fiat backing over the past several years.

Tags
Related Posts
Proving That Tether Manipulated Bitcoin 2017 Bull Run Won’t Be Easy
The iFinex–Tether market manipulation lawsuit continues. Last week, Judge Katherine Failla of the Southern District of New York selected Roche Cyrulnik Freedman as interim lead plaintiff counsel, and four civil actions were consolidated into a single class action: Leibowitz v. iFinex Inc. In the complaints, iFinex’s subsidiary, Bitfinex, and related stablecoin Tether (USDT) are charged with manipulating the Bitcoin market in 2017 — something the firm strenuously denied. Combination of old and new This isn’t shaping up as an ordinary civil action. As Failla observed in announcing her lead counsel decision on Feb. 27 via a telephone conference call, she …
Sec / March 8, 2020
Report: US-Based Traders Can Still Access Bitfinex Services
United States-based traders can still purportedly access Bitfinex’s cryptocurrency trading services, despite recent claims that the firm is not active in the state. An anonymous source told blockchain and crypto news agency The Block that they were able to access Bitfinex from within the borders of the state of New York, according to a July 26 report. Per The Block, the unnamed trader created an account with the tongue-in-cheek username “ImaNYresident”, and subsequently gained access to the platform by simply selecting a query stating that they are not a U.S. resident. Bitfinex discontinued services for U.S.-based customers in August 2017 …
Altcoin / July 27, 2019
Bitfinex and Tether Double Down on Claim of No Customers in New York
Lawyers for Bitfinex and Tether, in the course of an ongoing case against the New York Attorney General (NYAG), submitted multiple fillings on July 22 alleging that the companies never served customers within New York. In one filing, attorney Stuart Hoegner noted the provision in Bitfinex’s terms of service that require that customers that transact be foreign entities: “Under Bitfinex’s and Tether’s Terms of Service, Eligible Contract Participants (‘ECPs’) that transact with Bitfinex or Tether must be foreign entities. Although those foreign entities may have shareholders or personnel who reside in, or otherwise have contact with, the United States or …
Altcoin / July 23, 2019
Bitfinex and Tether Obtain Stay of Demands From New York Supreme Court
Cryptocurrency exchange Bitfinex and its affiliated stablecoin issuer Tether have been granted its stay of demands for which they applied yesterday May 21, according to a blog post published on May 22. Per the post, Justice Joel M. Cohen of the New York Supreme Court (NYSC) ruled to grant the companies their motion for an immediate stay of the document demands. The court thus only requires the parties to produce documents and information related to whether there is personal jurisdiction over the companies in New York, while staying the document order in all other regards. In yesterday’s motion, law firms …
United States / May 22, 2019
Tether, Bitfinex Request Lessening of Cash Use Restrictions Imposed by Injunction Order
Lawyers for parent firm iFinex Inc., Bitfinex, USD stablecoin issuer Tether and affiliated entities have submitted a letter to Justice Joel M. Cohen on May 13 asking for more leniency in the use of cash restrictions imposed by last month’s injunction. On April 24, the office of the Office of the New York Attorney General (NY OAG) had accused Bitfinex of losing $850 million of funds needed for user redemptions, and subsequently using capital from affiliated firm Tether to secretly cover the shortfall. Last week, Cohen had noted that the scope of the OAG court order was too broad, and …
United States / May 14, 2019