Congresspeople speak out against Tlaib's anti-stablecoin bill

Published at: Dec. 5, 2020

On Wednesday night, Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib introduced a bill before the U.S. House of Representatives looking to make fiat-pegged stablecoin operators abide by the same rules and registration requirements expected of banks.

The legislation, under the name “the Stablecoin Tethering and Bank Licensing Enforcement (STABLE) Act,” sets out a fresh and extremely expansive definition of stablecoin. It furthermore dictates a series of limitations that outlaw stablecoin issuance for any entity that is not “an insured depository institution that is a member of the Federal Reserve System,”

More aggressively, one of the bill’s provisions would make it:

“Unlawful for any person to issue a stablecoin or stablecoin-related product, to provide any stablecoin-related service, or otherwise engage in any stablecoin-related commercial activity, including activity involving stablecoins issued by other persons.”

The provisions provoked a remarkably unified outcry from the crypto community, including from Tlaib’s colleagues on the Financial Services Committee.

“The implications for this are just horrible,” Representative Warren Davidson told Cointelegraph regarding the bill. “Among the worst effects are for the people Tlaib is trying to protect, which are the unbanked and underbanked.”

The bill’s requirements, Davidson reasoned, would ensure that only major banks would be able to use stablecoin technologies in the U.S. “I don’t know their motives, but I know the effect is to lock in JPMcoin and kill everything else.”

In a statement, Congressman Tom Emmer similarly put forward the advantages that stablecoins could have for the low- and middle-income users:

“Those of us supportive of developing these new innovations in the United States have worked to learn about and understand this technology, which stands to have enormous beneficial impacts on low-to-moderate income Americans, and individuals worldwide.”

Emmer and Davidson are both Republicans, and both members of the Blockchain Caucus. The three representatives sponsoring the bill are Democrats. Cointelegraph got in contact with Tlaib’s staffers, as well as the team of co-sponsor and Fintech Task Force Chair Stephen Lynch, but neither was willing to provide any statement for the record.

Regarding the specific threats of the bill, Peter Van Valkenburgh of non-profit advocacy group Coin Center noted, this would threaten operators of nodes of decentralized networks like Ethereum, on which many stablecoins operate.

Rohan Grey, the bill’s author, disagreed. An assistant professor at Willamette University, Grey tweeted in response to criticism from Nick Szabo:

No, the little guys are also supposed to stop issuing stablecoins, but the idea that its going to be necessary to round up every person who runs a node to end the systemic risk posted by stablecoins writ large is fantasy and pretending it isnt is fearmongering.

— Rohan Grey (@rohangrey) December 3, 2020

But at the same time, Grey seems pretty willing to hold node operators culpable for sins of their networks:

Who is running the nodes? There is no such thing as a network without accountable parties.

— Rohan Grey (@rohangrey) December 3, 2020

None of which means that the bill will get anywhere. “Tlaib’s bill actually has to go through committee and get through the house senate and get the president to sign it,” said Davidson. “I would hope that the process would be able to stop it.”

Congress is ending soon. A bill governing stablecoins is not going to be at the top of anyone's priority list when December has become the U.S.'s national month of budget brinkmanship. 

Even in a new Congress, it’s tough to imagine this bill moving forward at all, and certainly not without major changes. It refers specifically to Facebook’s soon-to-launch Diem, formerly known as Libra, a stablecoin that has been a particular lightning rod for symbolic legislation that goes nowhere.

A lot of what such symbolic legislation aims to do is set a tone for the conversations surrounding new issues. The biggest impact of the STABLE Act may be the uproar it has caused.

Tags
Regulation
Law
Stablecoin
Facebook
Congress
Libra
Related Posts
Law Decoded: New threats to self-custody take shape in the US, Nov. 27–Dec. 4
Every Friday, Law Decoded delivers analysis on the week’s critical stories in the realms of policy, regulation and law. Editor's note For several weeks, rumors have circulated in the United States that the Treasury Department under Steven Mnuchin is planning some sort of rulemaking to ban or severely restrict self-hosted cryptocurrency wallets. The Treasury hasn’t made any public statements to support these rumors, but they are persistent and pervasive enough to be worth paying attention to. In the broader cycle of financial news, Secretary Mnuchin is currently under a lot more scrutiny for his plans to return nearly half a …
Regulation / Dec. 4, 2020
US Congresswoman Vows to Brand Facebook’s Libra a Security Despite Today’s Updates
A United States congresswoman has said that she will keep working to brand Facebook’s planned stablecoin Libra a security. Facebook and the Libra Association may well have to deal with the SEC In an April 16 announcement, Representative Sylvia Garcia (D-TX) denied that recent updates to Libra’s whitepaper had substantively changed the yet-to-be-released stablecoin’s status as a security. Garcia contends that the newly proposed version of Libra still derives value from a “basket of currencies” subject to change from the Libra Association, which hangs the value of the coin on the work of a third party i.e. a security under …
Regulation / April 16, 2020
Rep. Waters Opens Libra Hearing With Indictment of Facebook's Past Mistakes
Today, lawmakers on the United States House of Representatives Financial Services Committee are meeting to discuss the possible effects of Facebook’s proposed Libra cryptocurrency project on the financial system. As a Cointelegraph respondent reports on July 17, committee chair Rep. Maxine Waters has opened the hearing with an indictment of Facebook’s past behavior. In her statement, Waters said that there was a “demonstrated pattern of failing to keep consumer data private on a scale similar to Equifax.” Waters also stated that Facebook, “allowed malicious Russian state actors to purchase and target ads,” which purportedly influenced the 2016 U.S. presidential elections. …
Regulation / July 17, 2019
US Lawmakers Want to Brand Libra a Security, Association Disagrees
A couple of United States lawmakers are looking to classify stablecoins as securities. With Libra considering adopting fiat-pegged stablecoins rather than a single token supported by a basket of national currencies, the proposed crypto project might be facing yet another regulatory hurdle. Meanwhile, lawmakers sponsoring the bill say stablecoins should be classified as securities to protect U.S. consumers. If passed, stablecoin projects like Libra will potentially fall under the purview of stringent U.S. securities regulations. Critics of the move remark that such measures only serve to further dampen the country’s position in the emerging digital landscape. Some commentators have long …
United States / Dec. 1, 2019
Vale Diem: How Facebook’s ambitious stablecoin project came to an end
On Jan. 31, Meta, formerly known as Facebook, announced that it was pulling from its stablecoin project, Diem, formerly known as Libra. Intellectual property and other assets related to the operations of the Diem Payment Network were to be sold to Silvergate Capital Corporation, essentially meaning the end to Mark Zuckerberg and his corporations’ stablecoin aspirations, at least in their current shape. This also marks the end of a once-groundbreaking initiative that was revealed in 2019 with a promise to bring a global alternative to fiat money to Facebook’s 2-billion-strong user base. Here is how this plan went from the …
Regulation / Feb. 2, 2022